2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Electronic Medical Record–Based Discharge Disposition Tool Gets Bundle Busted: Decaying Relevance of Clinical Data Accuracy in Machine Learning

Abstract: Background Determining discharge disposition after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been a challenge. Advances in machine learning (ML) have produced computer models that learn by example to generate predictions on future events. We hypothesized a trained ML algorithm’s diagnostic accuracy will be better than that of current predictive tools to predict discharge disposition after primary TJA. Methods This study was a retrospective cohort study from a single, tertiary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirty-one studies assessed the prediction of clinical outcome and/or resource utilization for TJA 4,5,10,11,16,18-20,29-31,38-57 . The median sample size was 5,282 (range: 51 to 295,605).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thirty-one studies assessed the prediction of clinical outcome and/or resource utilization for TJA 4,5,10,11,16,18-20,29-31,38-57 . The median sample size was 5,282 (range: 51 to 295,605).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-one studies assessed the prediction of clinical outcome and/or resource utilization for TJA 4,5,10,11,16,[18][19][20][29][30][31][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57] . The median sample size was 5,282 (range: 51 to 295,605).…”
Section: Clinical Outcomes and Resource Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31-34 Other studies, seeking to improve on currently available tools, have sought to develop ML models to predict discharge disposition. 9,35 Greenstein et al 35 tested an electronic medical record–integrated artificial NN and compared it with RAPT; while providing a proof of concept of ML utility in predicting disposition outcomes, they concluded that their artificial NN, with an AUC of 0.804 and an accuracy of 61.3%, did worse than currently available tools, such as RAPT. In comparison, this present study developed ML models with improved reliability and responsiveness and found that LSVM had the highest AUC at 0.801 with a reliability of 82.37%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be defined as a fully connected, feed-forward ANN with a single hidden layer. According to Greenstein et al [ 9 ], this method works by taking the input variables, multiplying them by weights (amount of impact), and using a nonlinear function to scale this information within a range. Moreover, this process occurs at each node within the neural network to optimize it ( Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%