1988
DOI: 10.1080/00405008808659170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Electronic Instrument for Measuring the Hairiness of Jute Yarn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this method has the advantages of simplicity in operation, manual counting and measuring could be laborious, time consuming and lower efficient (Goswami, 1969; Barella & Viaplana, 1970;Ghosh et al, 1988). …”
Section: Microscopic Visualization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this method has the advantages of simplicity in operation, manual counting and measuring could be laborious, time consuming and lower efficient (Goswami, 1969; Barella & Viaplana, 1970;Ghosh et al, 1988). …”
Section: Microscopic Visualization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The image of yarns after amplification can be projected onto a screen, and then the number of protruding, looped and floating hairiness per unit length could be counted and measured manually. Although this method has the advantages of simplicity in operation, manual counting and measuring could be laborious, time consuming and lower efficient (Goswami, 1969;Barella & Viaplana, 1970;Ghosh et al, 1988).…”
Section: Microscopic Visualization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hairiness is a crucial parameter evaluating the status of protruding fiber ends, loops and wild fiber out of yarn bodies, and is one of the important yarn surface characteristics. 1,2 Since the 1950s, several methods [3][4][5][6][7][8] and instruments [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] have been developed to characterize yarn hairiness, notably the Uster Tester, Uster Zweigle hairiness tester, SDL hairiness tester, Lawson Hemphill tester, Keisokki Laserspot tester, amongst others; in addition, the most novel solutions for yarn hairiness measurement were mainly based on digital image processing and signal processing. 19,20 Notwithstanding this, only two methods were universally accepted and commercially utilized in textile industries and institutions: (a) an array of sensors measures the length of fiber ends protruding out of the yarn core; and (b) the amount of light scattered by the protruding fibers is used to calculate a hairiness index value for the yarn.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few analytical techniques have been reported for measuring fuzz attached to fabrics, although many techniques have been developed to measure fuzz attached to yarns [3,6,7,[9][10][11]. Scanning electron microscopy has been used to characterize fuzz qualitatively on fabrics [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%