Abstract:Abstract--Parallel-oriented and exceptionally long (> 10 #m) tubes of halloysite occur in the pallid zone of a deeply-weathered lateritic profile on granite in southwest Australia.Transmission electron microscopy and selected-area electron diffraction of ultrathin sections showed that kaolinite plates within pseudomorphs of mica crystals had fractured at irregular intervals along the a crystallographic axis to produce laths elongated along the b axis. The laths near the edges of the pseudomorphs were less cons… Show more
“…These authors describe bundles of laths originating from a parallel fracturing of a larger plate at regular intervals. These parallel kaolinite laths may be an early stage of formation of halloysite tubes by rolling or folding (Brindley and Comer, 1956;Singh and Gilkes, 1992b). In the present work, we did not observe this last stage either because it requires an appropriate environment or because the laths are unrolled tubes.…”
Section: Atem and Image Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Both are typical morphologies of pseudomorphous kaolinite occurring in weathering profiles developed by in situ evolution. Laths are described by Singh and Gilkes (1992b) as a common morphological feature of kaolinite pseudomorphs after mica. These authors describe bundles of laths originating from a parallel fracturing of a larger plate at regular intervals.…”
The clay particles in a kaolin deposit from Brazil were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential thermal analysis (DTA), analytical transmission electron microscopy (ATEM), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) to examine the relationships between morphological and chemical properties of the crystals and to relate these properties to formation conditions. The XRD patterns show the dominant presence of kaolinite with minor amounts of gibbsite, illite, quartz, goethite, hematite, and anatase. ATEM observations show two discontinuities in the deposit as indicated by changes in morphology and size of the kaolinite crystals. At the base of the deposit, hexagonal platy and lath-shaped particles (mean area of 001 face = 0.26 p,m 2) maintain the original fabric of the parent rock which characterizes an in situ evolution. In the middle of the deposit a bimodal population of large (mean area of 001 face > 0.05 ixm:) and small (mean area of 001 face < 0.05 p.m 2) sub-hexagonal platy kaolinite crystals occurs. This zone defines the boundary between the saprolitic kaolinite and the pedogenic kaolinite. Near the top of the profile, laths and irregular plates of kaolinite, together with sub-hexagonal particles, define two different depositional sources in the history of formation of the deposit. Crystal thickness as derived from the width of basal reflections and the Hinckley index are compatible with the morphological results, but show only one discontinuity. At the base of the deposit, kaolinite has a lowdefect density whereas in the middle and at the top of the profile, kaolinite has a high-defect density. Likewise, EPR spectroscopy shows typical spectra of low-defect kaolinite for the bottom of the deposit and typical spectra of high-defect kaolinite for the other portions of the deposit. Despite the morphological changes observed through the profile, the elemental composition of individual kaolinite crystals did not show systematic variations. These results are consistent with the deposit consisting of a transported pedogenic kaolinite over saprolite consisting of in situ kaolinized phyllite.
“…These authors describe bundles of laths originating from a parallel fracturing of a larger plate at regular intervals. These parallel kaolinite laths may be an early stage of formation of halloysite tubes by rolling or folding (Brindley and Comer, 1956;Singh and Gilkes, 1992b). In the present work, we did not observe this last stage either because it requires an appropriate environment or because the laths are unrolled tubes.…”
Section: Atem and Image Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Both are typical morphologies of pseudomorphous kaolinite occurring in weathering profiles developed by in situ evolution. Laths are described by Singh and Gilkes (1992b) as a common morphological feature of kaolinite pseudomorphs after mica. These authors describe bundles of laths originating from a parallel fracturing of a larger plate at regular intervals.…”
The clay particles in a kaolin deposit from Brazil were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential thermal analysis (DTA), analytical transmission electron microscopy (ATEM), and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) to examine the relationships between morphological and chemical properties of the crystals and to relate these properties to formation conditions. The XRD patterns show the dominant presence of kaolinite with minor amounts of gibbsite, illite, quartz, goethite, hematite, and anatase. ATEM observations show two discontinuities in the deposit as indicated by changes in morphology and size of the kaolinite crystals. At the base of the deposit, hexagonal platy and lath-shaped particles (mean area of 001 face = 0.26 p,m 2) maintain the original fabric of the parent rock which characterizes an in situ evolution. In the middle of the deposit a bimodal population of large (mean area of 001 face > 0.05 ixm:) and small (mean area of 001 face < 0.05 p.m 2) sub-hexagonal platy kaolinite crystals occurs. This zone defines the boundary between the saprolitic kaolinite and the pedogenic kaolinite. Near the top of the profile, laths and irregular plates of kaolinite, together with sub-hexagonal particles, define two different depositional sources in the history of formation of the deposit. Crystal thickness as derived from the width of basal reflections and the Hinckley index are compatible with the morphological results, but show only one discontinuity. At the base of the deposit, kaolinite has a lowdefect density whereas in the middle and at the top of the profile, kaolinite has a high-defect density. Likewise, EPR spectroscopy shows typical spectra of low-defect kaolinite for the bottom of the deposit and typical spectra of high-defect kaolinite for the other portions of the deposit. Despite the morphological changes observed through the profile, the elemental composition of individual kaolinite crystals did not show systematic variations. These results are consistent with the deposit consisting of a transported pedogenic kaolinite over saprolite consisting of in situ kaolinized phyllite.
“…Topotactic or epitactic alteration of mica or feldspar to halloysite has not previously been identified in nature (Gilkes et aL, 1986;Singh and Gilkes, 1992), whereas kaolinite formed from mica by topotactic alteration can subsequently produce halloysite tubes . Nevertheless, halloysite may also be formed through alteration of feldspar via solution or a non-crystalline intermediate stage (Eswaran and Bin, 1978;Singh and Gilkes, 1992). Robertson and Eggleton (1991) explained the transformation of platy kaolinite into spiral halloysite rods by a loss of structural rigidity at points along the kaolinite crystal due to hydration of kaolinite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robertson and Eggleton (1991) explained the transformation of platy kaolinite into spiral halloysite rods by a loss of structural rigidity at points along the kaolinite crystal due to hydration of kaolinite. Also, Singh and Gilkes (1992) showed a development of parallel halloysite tubes and laths through deformation of platy kaolinite pseudomorphs after mica. These authors described the tranformation of kaolinite plates by fragmentation into laths that rolled or folded to form halloysite tubes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may form from feldspars and/or micas by weathering or hydrothermal processes or it may crystallize direct from solution (Stoch and Sikora, 1976;Keller, 1978;Wilke et al, 1978;Meunier and Velde, 1979;Anand et al, 1985;Banfield and Eggleton, 1990;Robertson and Eggleton, 1991;Jiang and Peacor, 1991;Singh and Gilkes, 1992). Topotactic or epitactic alteration of mica or feldspar to halloysite has not previously been identified in nature (Gilkes et aL, 1986;Singh and Gilkes, 1992), whereas kaolinite formed from mica by topotactic alteration can subsequently produce halloysite tubes . Nevertheless, halloysite may also be formed through alteration of feldspar via solution or a non-crystalline intermediate stage (Eswaran and Bin, 1978;Singh and Gilkes, 1992).…”
Abstract~he transformation of kaolinite to halloysite-7 .~ was identified in the kaolin deposit of S~o Vicente de Pereira (SVP), using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Both the 02,1 i and 13,13 reflections show changes in the XRD patterns along the kaolinite to halloysite-7 ,~ transition, and the FTIR spectra show changes corresponding to both OH and Si-O-stretching bands and Al-O-Si-bending vibrations. The interlayer water content in the kaolinite structure increases during transition. The two-layer periodicity of well-ordered kaolinite and rolling up of kaolinite plates are observed using hi~h-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). Long and short tubes exhibit halloysite-7 A. No structural Fe was found in the kaolinite samples. Analytical electron microscopy (AEM) indicates no substitution of AP § for Si 4+. The Si/A1 ratio shows values of --1 for the kaolinite and rolled kaolinite plates. The 27A1 magic angle spinning neutron magnetic resonance (MAS-NMR) spectra display a resonance centered at -1 ppm, assigned to six-coordinated aluminum. The transformation of kaolinite to halloysite-7 A. is controlled by surface reaction.
The release properties and reloading ability of polyelectrolyte‐modified halloysite nanotubes, polyelectrolyte‐modified SiO2 nanoparticles, and polyelectrolyte capsules are studied. Three containers are distinguished by keeping the low‐molecular‐weight corrosion inhibitor benzotriazole in a hollow lumen inside or within the polyelectrolyte matrix and allowing release in either one direction or into all space dimensions. Polyelectrolyte shells, which modify the outer surface of the nanocontainers, are fabricated by using layer‐by‐layer assembly of poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride)/poly(styrene sulfonate), poly(allylamine hydrochloride)/poly(styrene sulfonate), and poly(allylamine hydrochloride)/poly(methacrylic acid) polyelectrolyte bilayers. All nanocontainers reveal an increase of the benzotriazole release in aqueous solution at alkaline or acidic pH. The highest reloading efficiency (up to 80 %) is observed for halloysite‐based nanocontainers; however, after five reloading cycles the efficiency decreases to 20 %. The application of appropriate nanocontainers depends on the demands required from feedback‐active anticorrosion coatings. For coatings where the immediate release of the inhibitor is necessary, SiO2‐based or halloysite‐based nanocontainers with a shell consisting of weak polyelectrolytes are preferable. When continuous, gradual release is required, halloysite‐based nanocontainers with a shell consisting of one weak and one or two strong polyelectrolytes are preferable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.