1965
DOI: 10.1021/j100895a012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Electron Diffraction Study of Trifluoronitrosomethane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, bonds b and f are of similar length, while bond c is always much shorter than bond b. Finally, bonds j and k are similar in length, although in simple neutral compounds where there is no possibility of signi®cant electronic delocalization these distances normally differ by at least 0.20 A Ê (Talberg, 1977;Schlemper et al, 1986) and the NO distance rarely exceeds 1.25 A Ê (Davis et al, 1965;Bauer & Andreassen, 1972;Talberg, 1977;Schlemper et al, 1986). These observations taken together con®rm the polarized form (B) as the dominant contributor to the overall electronic structure, rather than the classical charge-localized form (A):…”
Section: Figure 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, bonds b and f are of similar length, while bond c is always much shorter than bond b. Finally, bonds j and k are similar in length, although in simple neutral compounds where there is no possibility of signi®cant electronic delocalization these distances normally differ by at least 0.20 A Ê (Talberg, 1977;Schlemper et al, 1986) and the NO distance rarely exceeds 1.25 A Ê (Davis et al, 1965;Bauer & Andreassen, 1972;Talberg, 1977;Schlemper et al, 1986). These observations taken together con®rm the polarized form (B) as the dominant contributor to the overall electronic structure, rather than the classical charge-localized form (A):…”
Section: Figure 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the bond denoted f is always signi®cantly shorter than the rest of the CÐN bonds, while bond a is always very much longer. Finally, bonds j and k are similar in length, although in simple neutral compounds where there is no possibility of signi®cant electronic delocalization these distances normally differ by at least 0.20 A Ê (Talberg, 1977;Schlemper et al, 1986) and the NO distance rarely exceeds 1.25 A Ê (Davis et al, 1965;Bauer & Andreassen, 1972;Talberg, 1977;Schlemper et al, 1986). These observations taken all together point to the polarized form (A) [see Scheme (II)] as the dominant contributor to the overall molecular-electronic…”
Section: Molecular Dimensions and Conformationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An internal rotation constant F" = 2.44 cm-I can be calculated from the known ground state structure (6). If the barriers V, ' and V,", in the excited and ground electronic states respectively, are in phase (eclipsed conformation in both states), the most important transitions form a Au = 0 sequence as would be expected from simple Franck-Condon considerations.…”
Section: Satellite Band Structure and The Barriers To Internal Rotatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ground state structure of CF,NO has been determined by electron diffraction (6). The NO group is eclipsed by one of the CF bonds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%