“…However, the r g structures of both phosphoranes as well as the r α and r a structures of PCl 5 are known from gas electron diffraction studies. 29−31 The experimental 29,30 r g and r α internuclear distances are listed in Table 5. Like PH 3 F 2 and PF 5 (see subsection 3.3), PCl 3 F 2 and PCl 5 form trigonal bipyramidal molecules of D 3 h point-group symmetry in the gas phase.…”
Section: Results
and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the theoretical best estimate of the r e structure of PCl 3 F 2 , the rotational constants of P 35 In PCl 5 , the bond lengths at equilibrium (best estimates) are distinctly shorter than the corresponding r g distances, 30 by 1.0 and 0.9 pm, respectively, for the equatorial and axial bonds. These differences correspond to at least three times the experimental 30 uncertainties (see Table 5), which appears to be quite substantial.…”
Section: The Journal Of Physical Chemistry Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Finally, for PCl 5 average structural parameters denoted r α , r g , and r a are available. 30,31…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Finally, for PCl 5 average structural parameters denoted r α , r g , and r a are available. 30,31 Previously, we considered target and test molecules consisting only of first-row and hydrogen atoms. 21 We start our current investigation by demonstrating that the chosen computational procedure is capable of accurately describing also the geometries of selected test molecules containing second-row atoms (P and Cl), namely, PH (X 3 Σ − ), PF (X 3 Σ − ), PCl (X 3 Σ − ), PH 2 (X 2 B 1 ), PF 2 (X 2 B 1 ), and PH 3 (X 1 A 1 ).…”
Among
the title species, a reliable and accurate equilibrium geometry
(re structure) is available only for PF3, which has been determined experimentally more than 20 years
ago. Here, we report accurate re structures
for all title molecules, which were obtained using a composite computational
approach based on explicitly correlated coupled-cluster theory (CCSD(T)-F12b)
in conjunction with a large correlation-consistent basis set (cc-pCVQZ-F12)
to take core–valence electron correlation into account. Additional
terms were included to correct for the effects of iterative triple
excitations (CCSDT), noniterative quadruple excitations (CCSDT(Q)),
and scalar relativistic contributions (DKH2-CCSD(T)). The performance
of this computational procedure was established through test calculations
on selected small molecules (PH, PF, PCl, PH2, PF2, and PH3). For PF3, PCl3, PH3F2, and PF5 sufficiently accurate experimental
ground-state rotational constants from the literature were used to
determine semiexperimental re structures,
which were found to be in excellent agreement with the corresponding
best estimates from the current composite approach. The recommended
equilibrium structural parameters are for PCl3, re(PCl) = 203.94 pm and θe(ClPCl)
= 100.18°; for PH3F2, re(PHeq) = 138.38 pm and re(PFax) = 164.15 pm; for PF5, re(PFeq) = 153.10 pm and re(PFax) = 157.14 pm; for PCl3F2, re(PCleq) = 200.21
pm and re(PFax) = 159.37 pm;
and for PCl5, re(PCleq) = 201.29 pm and re(PClax) = 211.83 pm. The associated uncertainties are estimated to be ±0.10
pm and ±0.10°, respectively.
“…However, the r g structures of both phosphoranes as well as the r α and r a structures of PCl 5 are known from gas electron diffraction studies. 29−31 The experimental 29,30 r g and r α internuclear distances are listed in Table 5. Like PH 3 F 2 and PF 5 (see subsection 3.3), PCl 3 F 2 and PCl 5 form trigonal bipyramidal molecules of D 3 h point-group symmetry in the gas phase.…”
Section: Results
and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the theoretical best estimate of the r e structure of PCl 3 F 2 , the rotational constants of P 35 In PCl 5 , the bond lengths at equilibrium (best estimates) are distinctly shorter than the corresponding r g distances, 30 by 1.0 and 0.9 pm, respectively, for the equatorial and axial bonds. These differences correspond to at least three times the experimental 30 uncertainties (see Table 5), which appears to be quite substantial.…”
Section: The Journal Of Physical Chemistry Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Finally, for PCl 5 average structural parameters denoted r α , r g , and r a are available. 30,31…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Finally, for PCl 5 average structural parameters denoted r α , r g , and r a are available. 30,31 Previously, we considered target and test molecules consisting only of first-row and hydrogen atoms. 21 We start our current investigation by demonstrating that the chosen computational procedure is capable of accurately describing also the geometries of selected test molecules containing second-row atoms (P and Cl), namely, PH (X 3 Σ − ), PF (X 3 Σ − ), PCl (X 3 Σ − ), PH 2 (X 2 B 1 ), PF 2 (X 2 B 1 ), and PH 3 (X 1 A 1 ).…”
Among
the title species, a reliable and accurate equilibrium geometry
(re structure) is available only for PF3, which has been determined experimentally more than 20 years
ago. Here, we report accurate re structures
for all title molecules, which were obtained using a composite computational
approach based on explicitly correlated coupled-cluster theory (CCSD(T)-F12b)
in conjunction with a large correlation-consistent basis set (cc-pCVQZ-F12)
to take core–valence electron correlation into account. Additional
terms were included to correct for the effects of iterative triple
excitations (CCSDT), noniterative quadruple excitations (CCSDT(Q)),
and scalar relativistic contributions (DKH2-CCSD(T)). The performance
of this computational procedure was established through test calculations
on selected small molecules (PH, PF, PCl, PH2, PF2, and PH3). For PF3, PCl3, PH3F2, and PF5 sufficiently accurate experimental
ground-state rotational constants from the literature were used to
determine semiexperimental re structures,
which were found to be in excellent agreement with the corresponding
best estimates from the current composite approach. The recommended
equilibrium structural parameters are for PCl3, re(PCl) = 203.94 pm and θe(ClPCl)
= 100.18°; for PH3F2, re(PHeq) = 138.38 pm and re(PFax) = 164.15 pm; for PF5, re(PFeq) = 153.10 pm and re(PFax) = 157.14 pm; for PCl3F2, re(PCleq) = 200.21
pm and re(PFax) = 159.37 pm;
and for PCl5, re(PCleq) = 201.29 pm and re(PClax) = 211.83 pm. The associated uncertainties are estimated to be ±0.10
pm and ±0.10°, respectively.
“…Furthermore, the difference in the lengths of axial and equatorial bonds, Δ r = r (MX ax ) − r (MX eq ), depends strongly on whether M is a Group 5 or a Group 15 element. In the former case, values of Δ r are found in the range 0.00–0.05 Å, whereas in the latter Δ r spans the range 0.05–0.10 Å, the last value representing a 5 % difference (in the PCl bonds of PCl 5 45). This familiar behavior of the Group 15 derivatives has been rationalized in terms of the effective electronegativity of the central atom and the hypervalent nature and consequent orbital deficiency of the molecule, implying a significant difference in polarity between axial and equatorial MX bonds 46.…”
The molecular structures of the monomeric, pentacoordinated methylchloroniobium(V) compounds Me 3 NbCl 2 and Me 2 NbCl 3 have been determined by gas electron diffraction (GED) and Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations, and, for Me 3 NbCl 2 , by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Each of the molecules is found to have a heavy-atom skeleton in the form of a trigonal bipyramid (TBP) with Cl atoms in the axial positions, in accord with their vibrational spectra. The TBP is somewhat distorted in the case of Me 2 NbCl 3 with the two axial Nb-Cl bonds bent away from the equatorial, slightly shorter Nb-Cl bond. In the case of Me 3 NbCl 2 , moreover, the X-ray model suggests structural distortions away from the idealized C 3h geometry, in line with the results of quantum
Ab initio calculations using effective core potentials and polarized split-valence basis sets are reported for the title compounds. The calculated geometries, vibrational frequencies, infrared intensities, harmonic force fields, dipole moments, relative energies, and barriers to pseudorotation are compared with the available experimental data for the known molecules. Predictions are made for those pentahalides that are still unknown. Trends in the calculated properties are identified and discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.