Transient behavior of direct methanol fuel cells ͑DMFCs͒ during the preconditioning process has been investigated with a focus on changes manifested in the anode by using an electrochemical impedance spectroscopic analysis. Preconditioning of membrane electrode assembly ͑MEA͒ is essential to achieve maximum cell performance, and the time required to accomplish the conditioning may vary depending on the methods that are adopted. Preconditioning temperature substantially influences the behaviors of MEAs, and room-temperature treatment has been found to be more favorable than high-temperature treatment at 90°C. Application of electric load during the preconditioning process accelerates the hydration of electrolyte and thus reduces the time required to reach a maximum performance limit. The anode impedance data of DMFC has been deconvoluted by using an equivalent circuit to investigate three kinds of resistances in the MEA, such as resistance of charge transfer ͑R ct ͒, electrolytes ͑R e ͒, and pore electrolytes ͑R p ͒. The underpinning mechanism which causes the change in performance during the preconditioning process is discussed in terms of the changes in the resistance elements of the anode. In recent times, intense research interest has been channeled in improving the performance of direct methanol fuel cells ͑DMFCs͒ based on polymer electrolyte membranes. Performance of a DMFC is strongly influenced not only by the fabrication procedure of membrane electrode assembly ͑MEA͒ but also by the preconditioning method adopted. Hence, to improve the performance of DMFCs, it is important to establish an appropriate conditioning method for MEAs. Several methods have been proposed for conditioning of MEAs to achieve a stable and improved performance of DMFCs. [1][2][3][4] In DMFCs as in the case of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell ͑PEMFCs͒, sufficient hydration of polymer electrolyte membrane and recast ionomer in the catalyst layer is necessary to obtain stable proton conductivity, and hence the hydration process might require about 24-48 h. For instance, Aricó et al.1 supplied water to both the anode and cathode compartments of a DMFC, and the cell was warmed up stepwise to a maximum operating temperature of 95°C, followed by an operation with the supply of methanol ͑0.5 M͒ and oxygen at a high current for a period of 24 h. Shukla et al. 2 collected the polarization curves of DMFCs after hydrating the MEAs for 24 h by circulating a 2 M methanol solution through the anode compartment at 80°C. Scott et al. 3 adopted both the above methods.They 4 suggested that hydrogen evolution on electrodes could influence the performance of DMFCs by reducing the overpotential of both oxygen reduction as well as methanol oxidation reactions. Though various routes have been employed for conditioning MEAs, to the best of our knowledge, no definite explanation has been offered in the literature on the mechanism of performance changes that occur during the conditioning period, except a brief mention in our previous study.
5Our presen...