2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0nr00952k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An electrochemical biosensor exploiting binding-induced changes in electron transfer of electrode-attached DNA origami to detect hundred nanometer-scale targets

Abstract:

Using DNA origami as the recognition element in an electrochemical biosensor enables the selective and direct detection of “mesoscale” virus-sized analytes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the approach can be used to interrogate E-DNA sensors containing an antibody-binding epitope, 38 aptamer-based sensors binding to protein targets, 13 or DNA-origami-based sensors binding to single-entity, mesoscale targets. 39…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the approach can be used to interrogate E-DNA sensors containing an antibody-binding epitope, 38 aptamer-based sensors binding to protein targets, 13 or DNA-origami-based sensors binding to single-entity, mesoscale targets. 39…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, previous works have shown changes in Δ E P upon hybridization of the surface-bound, MB-modified DNA with complementary strands. , In these cases, DNA hybridization moves MB further away from the electrode surface, leading to an increase in Δ E P (i.e., signal-ON sensors). Similarly, the approach can be used to interrogate E-DNA sensors containing an antibody-binding epitope, aptamer-based sensors binding to protein targets, or DNA-origami-based sensors binding to single-entity, mesoscale targets …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, DNA origami nanostructures avoid the use of thiolated probes and, because of their larger surface area, allow the immobilization of a larger number of probes compared to TDNs. [13,14] Nevertheless, to date the use of DNA origami nanostructures in electrochemical biosensors is much smaller than that of TDNs.…”
Section: Dna Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the invention of the DNA origami approach, which exploits Watson-Crick base-pairing between a single-stranded DNA scaffold and multiple short staple-strands to fold the scaffold into a specific predefined geometry (2), allowed the folding of nanostructures with large surface area while simultaneously enabling spatially controlled assemblies and site-specific chemical functionalisation (3). These unique characteristics have enabled the assembly of nanostructures and patterns with controlled geometry and function, either by directly folding the scaffold (4,5), or via higher-order assembly of pre-formed DNA tiles (6)(7)(8), which found applications in biosensing (9)(10)(11)(12)(13), drug delivery (14,15), and as tools for studying biological processes (16,17), inter alia. Fuelled by these rapid developments in engineering and fabricating complex DNA nanostructures, there is an increasing demand for their characterisation, including the assessment of assembly yields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%