An electrochemical and high-speed imaging study of micropore decontamination by acoustic bubble entrapment

Abstract

Electrochemical and high-speed imaging techniques are used to study the abilities of ultrasonically-activated bubbles to clean out micropores. Cylindrical pores with dimensions (diameter × depth) of 500 μm × 400 μm (aspect ratio 0.8), 125 μm × 350 μm (aspect ratio 2.8) and 50 μm × 200 μm (aspect ratio 4.0) are fabricated in glass substrates. Each pore is contaminated by filling it with an electrochemically inactive blocking organic material (thickened methyl salicylate) before the substrate is placed in a solution containing an electroactive species (Fe(CN)6(3-)). An electrode is fabricated at the base of each pore and the Faradaic current is used to monitor the decontamination as a function of time. For the largest pore, decontamination driven by ultrasound (generated by a horn type transducer) and bulk fluid flow are compared. It is shown that ultrasound is much more effective than flow alone, and that bulk fluid flow at the rates used cannot decontaminate the pore completely, but that ultrasound can. In the case of the 125 μm pore, high-speed imaging is used to elucidate the cleaning mechanisms involved in ultrasonic decontamination and reveals that acoustic bubble entrapment is a key feature. The smallest pore is used to explore the limits of decontamination and it is found that ultrasound is still effective at this size under the conditions employed.

Cavitation clusters in lipid systems – surface effects, local heating and streamer formation

“…Nevertheless, these velocities are not insignificant. For example, comparative measurements in water 39 indicate an average velocity of 2.450 ± 0.370 m s -1 at ~5 mm from the PLE. shows a cluster periodicity corresponding to f/4 (shown as the time interval between yellow and red highlighted frames) as determined by acoustic emission analysis.…”

Dolphin-Inspired Target Detection for Sonar and Radar

“…Humans have spent over a century researching this interaction for a range of applications (Ainslie, Leighton, 2009). These include attempts to derive beneficial effects from bubble acoustics, in fields as diverse as: climate science for air/sea transfer (Thorpe, 1992 ; the processing and monitoring of pharmaceuticals and food (Campbell, Mougeot, 1999;Skumiel et al, 2013), and of fuel and coolant (Leighton et al, 2012a); the generation of microfluidic devices (Carugo et al, 2011); ultrasonic cleaning (Leighton et al, 2005;Offin et al, 2014); and, in biomedicine, the provision of acoustic contrast agents and drug delivery vectors (Ferrara et al, 2007), and the use of cavitation as a therapy monitor (McLaughlan et al, 2010;Leighton et al, 2008a). Studies also include attempts to mitigate or exploit the detrimental effects of bubbles, for example in the cavitation erosion of turbines and propellers Szantyr, Koronowicz, 2006), ship noise and its environmental impact (Kozaczka, Grelowska, 2004;Parks et al, 2007;Grelowska et al, 2013), and the sonar clutter that oceanic bubbles can produce.…”

Ultrasonic cleaning of 3D printed objects and Cleaning Challenge Devices

“…In the semiconductor industry these questions have been answered to a certain extent [19]. An intuitive and simple procedure is to weight the sample before and after it is cleaned; the use of microbalances to monitor contaminant removal in ultrasonic cleaning applications has been reported [20], as well as micro-pores as model systems for particle removal from high aspect ratio structures [21]. In this article we outline several methods for quantitative cleaning measurement particularly oriented to ultrasound and 3D printed objects.…”