2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2011.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An electoral preferences model based on self-organizing maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neural networks application fields are typically those where elassie algorithms fail because of their inflexibility (they need precise input datasets) [12]. Usually problems with imprecise input datasets are those whose number of possible inputs datasets is so big that they cannot be classified.…”
Section: Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural networks application fields are typically those where elassie algorithms fail because of their inflexibility (they need precise input datasets) [12]. Usually problems with imprecise input datasets are those whose number of possible inputs datasets is so big that they cannot be classified.…”
Section: Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have used various clustering techniques to quantify the different levels of agreement among climate change opinions, including hierarchical cluster analysis (Barnes and Toma 2012;Jones and Song 2014), classification tree models (Lee et al 2015), and audience segmentation analysis (Maibach et al 2011;Rolfe-Redding et al 2011;Detenber et al 2016). A few of them conducted general opinion and sentiment analysis research using self-organizing maps (SOM) as a spatiotemporal clustering method (Sharma and Dey 2013;Neme et al 2011;Janetzko et al 2013), though none of these explicitly focused on climate change opinions. There remains some concern that these and similar methods may contribute to increased local polarization, do little to promote changing values on climate change, and can reflect a particular researcher's methodological preference (Hine et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tuia, et al, have used a SOM for the clustering of urban municipalities in Switzerland depending on their socio-economic profile [22]. The mechanism for self-organization in a SOM has even been used in a non-computational way as a metaphor to explain the patterns in electoral processes [16,17]. The second author has used SOMs to identify benchmark universities on the basis of student assessment of university websites [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%