1997
DOI: 10.1109/58.656634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An elasticity microscope. Part I: Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The beam width is in turn dependent on the central frequency and f-number of the focused ultrasonic transducer. [10][11][12] For the 25 MHz transducer used in our experiments, the spatial resolution within the sensor plane was approximately 120 m. Resolution on the order of few micrometers can be obtained using low f-number, high frequency ultrasound transducers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam width is in turn dependent on the central frequency and f-number of the focused ultrasonic transducer. [10][11][12] For the 25 MHz transducer used in our experiments, the spatial resolution within the sensor plane was approximately 120 m. Resolution on the order of few micrometers can be obtained using low f-number, high frequency ultrasound transducers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,9,10 Briefly, AlloDerm and EVPOME samples were immersed in deionized water and imaged with a singleelement fixed-focus transducer, producing ultrasonic B-scans. The transducer has an approximate frequency of 50 MHz, and the element is 3 mm in diameter and focused to a depth of 4.1 mm, giving an f/number of *1.4.…”
Section: Fig 2 (A-d) Sam 2d B-scans Between the Unseeded Allodermmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of using SAM over conventional optical and electron microscopy include being able to image cells and tissues without doing any preparations that could potentially kill or alter these tissues; this provides a more accurate representation of the tissues' properties. 1,2,20 We used SAM and an in-house-built mechanical compressor to examine the morphology and nonlinear elastic properties, specifically Ogden nonlinear elastic stress-strain models, respectively, of the commercially available acellular cadaveric dermis, AlloDerm Ò (LifeCell Corp.) and an in-housedesigned ex vivo produced oral mucosa equivalent (EVPOME).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A discretized version of this receive signal, denoted as f(k), can be written as (1) where N r is the grid size determined by the range interval size and the sampling rate, n(k) is the noise signal, g i (k − j) is the system impulse response created by a unit strength scatterer located on the ith image line at the jth range grid position, and s i (j) is the actual scatterer strength at that location. 2 , · · ·, g i , N r ] and g i, j be the vector version of g i (k − j). Then (1) can be rewritten as (2) where f, s and n are the vector versions of f(k), s(k), n(k), and n(k), respectively.…”
Section: A System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 , · · ·, g i , N r ] and g i, j be the vector version of g i (k − j). Then (1) can be rewritten as (2) where f, s and n are the vector versions of f(k), s(k), n(k), and n(k), respectively. The imaging operator G, defined as (3) is a (typically, underdetermined) matrix operator consisting of N φ linear convolution matrices.…”
Section: A System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%