2012
DOI: 10.1002/fld.3645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An eigenvector‐based linear reconstruction approach for time stepping in discontinuous Galerkin scheme used to solve shallow water equations

Abstract: SUMMARY Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods have shown promising results for solving the two‐dimensional shallow water equations. In this paper, the classical Runge–Kutta (RK) time discretisation is replaced by the eigenvector‐based reconstruction (EVR) that allows the second‐order time accuracy to be achieved within a single time‐stepping procedure. Moreover, the EVRDG approach yields stable solutions near drying and wetting fronts, whereas the classical RKDG approach yields instabilities. The proposed EVRDG … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are receiving increasing interest in water resource research in light of the applied advances adopted in finite volume methods [e.g., Bokhove , ; Ern et al ., ; Gourgue et al ., ; Kesserwani and Liang , ]. In addition to the factors discussed above under (ii) and (iii), these also include other characteristic features such as hp ‐adaptivity, local slope coefficient limiting, polynomial wet/dry front tracking, and the time stepping issue [e.g., Krivodonova et al ., ; Kubatko et al ., 2009; Kesserwani and Liang , ; Xing et al ., ; Araud et al ., ]. However, the DG formulation is seldom adopted for the simulation of flood propagation problems hindered, perhaps, by its excessive complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are receiving increasing interest in water resource research in light of the applied advances adopted in finite volume methods [e.g., Bokhove , ; Ern et al ., ; Gourgue et al ., ; Kesserwani and Liang , ]. In addition to the factors discussed above under (ii) and (iii), these also include other characteristic features such as hp ‐adaptivity, local slope coefficient limiting, polynomial wet/dry front tracking, and the time stepping issue [e.g., Krivodonova et al ., ; Kubatko et al ., 2009; Kesserwani and Liang , ; Xing et al ., ; Araud et al ., ]. However, the DG formulation is seldom adopted for the simulation of flood propagation problems hindered, perhaps, by its excessive complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, this requires more data transfer on distributed memory architectures and, thus, affects the efficiency of parallel implementations. Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) schemes have been recently applied to the shallow water equations [16,17,18,19,20,21]. The DG method generalizes the concept of the FV method, while relying on the Finite Element notion of projecting the solution onto a space of trial functions, but, without the restriction of keeping the functions continuous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%