2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.11.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient tree seed inspired algorithm for parameter estimation of Photovoltaic models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide a comprehensive comparison, Table 8 compares the estimated parameters and RMSE values for the SDM obtained using the GOANM algorithm with other more recent optimization approaches, including gradient based optimizer with criss‐cross and NM algorithms (CCNMGBO) [41], improved moth flame algorithm (IMFOL) [42], ranking teaching–learning‐based optimization (RTLBO) [43], dynamic leader multi‐verse optimizer (DLMVO) [45], reptile search algorithm with Cauchy mutation and opposition‐based learning strategies (OBL‐RSACM) [46], chaos game optimization‐least squares (CGO‐LS) [47], artificial humming bird optimization (AHO) [48], particle swarm optimization with random reselection (PSOCS) [49], elite learning adaptive differential evolution (ELADE) [50], coyote optimization algorithm (COA) [51], gradient based optimizer with differential evolution and sine cosine algorithm (SDGBO) [44], hunger games search algorithm with quantum Nelder–Mead (IHGS) [52], bald eagle search (BES) [53], differential evolution (DE) [56], improved tunicate swarm optimization (ITSA) [54], tree seed inspired algorithm (TSA) [55]. The results highlight the GOANM's superior performance, as it achieves the lowest RMSE value among all the compared methods.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To provide a comprehensive comparison, Table 8 compares the estimated parameters and RMSE values for the SDM obtained using the GOANM algorithm with other more recent optimization approaches, including gradient based optimizer with criss‐cross and NM algorithms (CCNMGBO) [41], improved moth flame algorithm (IMFOL) [42], ranking teaching–learning‐based optimization (RTLBO) [43], dynamic leader multi‐verse optimizer (DLMVO) [45], reptile search algorithm with Cauchy mutation and opposition‐based learning strategies (OBL‐RSACM) [46], chaos game optimization‐least squares (CGO‐LS) [47], artificial humming bird optimization (AHO) [48], particle swarm optimization with random reselection (PSOCS) [49], elite learning adaptive differential evolution (ELADE) [50], coyote optimization algorithm (COA) [51], gradient based optimizer with differential evolution and sine cosine algorithm (SDGBO) [44], hunger games search algorithm with quantum Nelder–Mead (IHGS) [52], bald eagle search (BES) [53], differential evolution (DE) [56], improved tunicate swarm optimization (ITSA) [54], tree seed inspired algorithm (TSA) [55]. The results highlight the GOANM's superior performance, as it achieves the lowest RMSE value among all the compared methods.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 16 provides a comparison of the estimated parameters and RMSE values for the PV module obtained using the GOANM algorithm with other more recent optimization approaches, including CCNMGBO [41], IMFOL [42], RTLBO [43], DLMVO [45], OBL‐RSACM [46], CGO‐LS [47], AHO [48], PSOCS [49], ELADE [50], COA [51], SDGBO [44], IHGS [52], BES [53], DE [56], ITSA [54], TSA [55]. The results show that the GOANM algorithm achieves the lowest RMSE value among the compared methods, indicating its superior performance in accurately modelling the Photowatt‐PWP201 PV module.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, parameters of the single diode model (SDM) in the photovoltaic (PV) model [64] are optimized by using to explore its effectiveness further. In the experiment, two sets of data [65] from the RTC France PV module and the Photowatt-PWP201 PV module were used to estimate the parameters of the SDM model of the RTC France PV module; the unknown parameters of the Photowatt-PWP201 PV module were estimated.…”
Section: Parameter Estimation Of Solar Photovoltaic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%