2016
DOI: 10.1115/1.4033604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Reliability-Based Simulation Method for Optimum Laser Peening Treatment

Abstract: A method is introduced for efficient reliability-based design of laser peening (LP) surface treatment to extend fatigue life of metal components. The method includes nonparametric probability density estimation, surrogate modeling using a new finite element (FE or FEA) approach, and reliability analysis with correlated random variables (RVs). Efficient LP simulation is achieved via a new technique termed single explicit analysis using time-dependent damping (SEATD), which reduces simulation times by a factor o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For R d = 50 × 10 −5 , it only took 2 µs to become stabilized without variation in the internal energy. Hasser et al [17] also reported that the kinetic energy decreases quickly as damping increases. The model without damping showed the largest internal energy.…”
Section: Lsp Fe Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For R d = 50 × 10 −5 , it only took 2 µs to become stabilized without variation in the internal energy. Hasser et al [17] also reported that the kinetic energy decreases quickly as damping increases. The model without damping showed the largest internal energy.…”
Section: Lsp Fe Simulation Setupmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As a simulation method, the pressure loads were applied through explicit analysis and residual stress was analyzed by implicit analysis. As shown in Figure 1, Hasser et al [17] proposed SEATD analysis, which does not need to switch into implicit analysis but applies time-dependent damping after the loading period to stabilize the model. This method was performed six-times faster in terms of the total calculation time than the 2N + 1 analysis method that was proposed by Brockman et al [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Metamodels based on extensive campaigns of FEM simulations [17] [18]. The meta-models obviously have a relatively large computational cost during the model-building phase, but they can be used on-line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%