2010 Sixth International Conference on Natural Computation 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icnc.2010.5584209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient real-coded genetic algorithm for real-parameter optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26). The direction which a mutant vector will move towards is determined by simulating a flopped unbiased coin (Cormier et al 2001;Chen and Wang 2011). The d tt helps in improving the search ability of GA, its value decreases as number of generation increases (Eq.…”
Section: Meta-heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26). The direction which a mutant vector will move towards is determined by simulating a flopped unbiased coin (Cormier et al 2001;Chen and Wang 2011). The d tt helps in improving the search ability of GA, its value decreases as number of generation increases (Eq.…”
Section: Meta-heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the simulations, blended crossover (Raad, 2011) is used as [X min +a(X max -X min ),X max -a (X max -X min )], where a is a user-defined parameter; x are the i th gen of the first and second individuals chosen for the crossover, respectively. Mutation for this simulation is based on (Chen and Wang, 2011) where gen x i is expressed as follows:…”
Section: Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further improve the solution efficiency of RCGAs, many achievements and remarkable efforts have been completed and reported in the past few decades. According to mechanisms and techniques used, the previous developments and attempts made for RCGAs can be classified into the following categories: (1) the determination of an optimal population size [6][7][8][9]; (2) the initialization of population [10][11][12]; (3) the automatic adjustment of operator parameters [13][14][15]; (4) the control of population diversity [16][17][18][19]; (5) the improvement of existing crossover operators [20][21][22]; (5) the development of new crossover schemes [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]; (6) the investigation of novel evolutionary strategies [33][34][35]; and (7) the hybrid use of evolutionary operators [36][37][38][39]. The above summary shows that much emphasis has been placed to improve the crossover operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%