2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient numerical model for multicomponent compressible flow in fractured porous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we combine the implicit MHFE transport and pressure update and the CFE discrete fracture model with an implicit higher-order DG transport update, both in the fractures and the matrix. We demonstrate that with this approach the CFE method has low numerical dispersion and even higher computational efficiency than in Zidane and Firoozabadi (2014). A wide range of test cases demonstrate that this all-implicit method can achieve the same numerical accuracy as the IMPEC scheme, but with up to 5000 times larger time-steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, we combine the implicit MHFE transport and pressure update and the CFE discrete fracture model with an implicit higher-order DG transport update, both in the fractures and the matrix. We demonstrate that with this approach the CFE method has low numerical dispersion and even higher computational efficiency than in Zidane and Firoozabadi (2014). A wide range of test cases demonstrate that this all-implicit method can achieve the same numerical accuracy as the IMPEC scheme, but with up to 5000 times larger time-steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, in 3D the pore-volume of grid cells, particularly at the intersection of multiple fractures, becomes significantly smaller than the matrix grid cells and the CFL condition can make the scheme prohibitively expensive. Zidane and Firoozabadi (2014) mistook this as an inherent weakness of the CFE approach itself in comparing the computational efficiency of a different IMPEC-CFE implementation to an implicit FV transport update in a (D−1)-dimensional fracture grid. In this work, we combine the implicit MHFE transport and pressure update and the CFE discrete fracture model with an implicit higher-order DG transport update, both in the fractures and the matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more details about these coefficients and the MFE formulation the reader may refer to [15,16,30,31,32,33].…”
Section: Discretization Of the Total And Phase Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total flux is calculated by the hybridized mixed finite element method (MFE). The latter provides accurate calculation of the velocity field even in highly heterogeneous media when compared to the traditional finite element and finite volume methods [1,5,7,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. The strength of the MFE method is from the calculation of the pressure inside a finite element and the traces of the pressures at the interfaces of each finite element in the computational domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, there has been increasing attention on tight gas simulation by DFM (Gong B, 2011, Zidane & Firoozabadi, 2014. In general, DFM is more adaptive to various mechanisms when compared to analytical models and hence is adopted in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%