2020 International Conference on Electrical and Information Technologies (ICEIT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iceit48248.2020.9113234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Model Predictive Current Control Algorithm for Grid-Connected Multi-Level Inverter with Computational Delay Compensation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [5–8], the aim of the methods is to decrease T d . But T d can't be completely eliminated, which means that θ FF can't be 0.…”
Section: Coupling Characteristic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [5–8], the aim of the methods is to decrease T d . But T d can't be completely eliminated, which means that θ FF can't be 0.…”
Section: Coupling Characteristic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It not only slows down the regulation speed of the control loop, but also lead to coupling. There are two main methods to eliminate the time delay, one is model prediction control (MPC) [5–8], and the other is updating and sampling concepts improvement in the digital control [9, 10]. An open‐loop current controller based on MPC is proposed in [6], the sensitivity of the method to time delay is analysed and compensated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This way, 0.5Ts delay is introduced, which can be easily compensated by the controller. In [99], the authors used a long horizon prediction approach to compensate for the computational delay in the control loop of a multi‐level inverter. In the research work of [100], the authors employed a simple prediction algorithm technique utilising the reference signals with several switching periods ahead to eliminate the time‐delay in the control loop.…”
Section: Model‐based Time‐delay Compensation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the aforementioned issue and to fulfill the high-performance IPMSM application requirements (e.g., EVAs), numerous multilevel power converter structures are recognized: neutral-point clamped (NPC), flying capacitor (FC), cascade H-bridge (CHB), and modular multilevel (MM) [27][28][29]. Several researchers have investigated the multilevel power converter, thanks to its benefits: low voltage applied to each component, less dv/dt and low THD of the output voltage and current waveforms, and low switching loss using the redundancy of the switching states [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%