An efficient method for the determination of furan derivatives in apple cider and wine by solid phase extraction and high performance liquid chromatography—Diode array detector

Wines from fruits other than grapes: Current status and future prospectus

“…To overcome these problems headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC/MS) technique were developed and employed for determination of flavour volatiles in apple wine with an alcohol content below 12% (v/v) . Similarly, a reliable SPE-HPLC/DAD method was developed for the simultaneous separation and quantitation of 10 furan derivatives in apple cider and wine matrices, including 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-2, 5-dimethyl-3(2H)-furanone, 2-furoic acid, 2-furaldehyde, 3-furaldehyde, 2-acetylfuran, 5-methyl-2-furaldehyde, methyl 2-furoate, 2-propionylfuran and ethyl 2-furoate (Hu, Hernandez, Zhu, & Shao, 2013).…”

Vortex‐ and CO2‐gas‐assisted liquid–liquid microextraction with salt addition for the high‐performance liquid chromatographic determination of furanic compounds in concentrated juices and dried fruits

“…Moreover, the obtained LODs for 2‐F (0.13–0.22 μg/L) were lower than those reported using VALLME combined with HPLC–DAD (0.68–0.71 μg/L) , HS‐LPME with GC–MS (10 μg/kg) and SBSE with GC–MS (131–138 μg/L) , and comparable with direct dilution with HPLC–DAD method (0.23 μg/L) and DI‐SPME with GC–TOF‐MS (0.30 μg/L) . The LODs for 5‐MF (0.08–0.15 μg/L) were also lower than all the methods using VALLME–HPLC–DAD (0.50–0.55 μg/L) , SPE with HPLC–DAD (2.0–20 μg/L) , DI‐SPME with GC–TOF‐MS (0.90 μg/L) and direct dilution with HPLC–DAD (0.50 μg/L) . Other than that, the LODs for 3‐F (0.54–0.82 μg/L) were lower than all previous HPLC–DAD studies using VALLME (3.4–3.5 μg/L) , SPE (8–93 μg/L) , and direct dilution (9.0–10 μg/L) as sample preparation.…”

“…This represents an improvement in the separation time compared to the previously reported methods using HPLC–DAD (16 min) , MEKC (20 min) , CZE (17 min) and GC–FID (23 min) . Moreover, the analysis time is comparable with the reported HPLC–DAD method for the separation of five furanic compounds (∼12 min) . Detection wavelength was investigated for each compound.…”

“…The LODs for 5‐MF (0.08–0.15 μg/L) were also lower than all the methods using VALLME–HPLC–DAD (0.50–0.55 μg/L) , SPE with HPLC–DAD (2.0–20 μg/L) , DI‐SPME with GC–TOF‐MS (0.90 μg/L) and direct dilution with HPLC–DAD (0.50 μg/L) . Other than that, the LODs for 3‐F (0.54–0.82 μg/L) were lower than all previous HPLC–DAD studies using VALLME (3.4–3.5 μg/L) , SPE (8–93 μg/L) , and direct dilution (9.0–10 μg/L) as sample preparation. In the same manner, the obtained LODs for 2‐FA (0.27–0.41 μg/L) and 3‐FA (0.67–1.0 μg/L) were lower than the previously reported methods using direct dilution with HPLC–DAD (2‐FA, 1.0 μg/L; 3‐FA, 9.0 μg/L) and MEKC (2‐FA, 680 μg/L; 3‐FA, 520 μg/L) .…”

Extraction techniques for analysis of aroma compounds

“…Hu et al (2013) used HPLC with diode array detection to monitor 10 furan derivatives, including furaneol in cider and wine. Hu et al (2013) used HPLC with diode array detection to monitor 10 furan derivatives, including furaneol in cider and wine.…”