2011
DOI: 10.4161/fly.5.4.17560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient method for recombineering GAL4 and QF drivers

Abstract: IntroductionA current challenge in neuroscience is to develop connectomes, maps of the functional connections between neurons in a nervous system. A set of GAL4 and QF drivers specific for neurotransmitters and neurotransmitter receptors would facilitate the development of a Drosophila connectome since knowledge of the neurotransmitter usage of a presynaptic neuron entails knowledge of the neurotransmitter receptor usage of its post-synaptic neuron and vice versa. In Drosophila, many neurotransmitter-specific … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, InSITE allows in vivo exchange by simple genetic crosses avoiding microinjection experiments (Gohl et al, 2011). A final method is the introduction of transactivators into genomic constructs by recombineering (Stowers, 2011). …”
Section: : Genetic Access To Neuronal Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, InSITE allows in vivo exchange by simple genetic crosses avoiding microinjection experiments (Gohl et al, 2011). A final method is the introduction of transactivators into genomic constructs by recombineering (Stowers, 2011). …”
Section: : Genetic Access To Neuronal Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modifications, such as tags and mutations, are introduced at low copy number and fixed within a bacterial colony prior to plasmid copy number amplification for plasmid purification for microinjection. Recombineering has been used with P[acman] and FlyFos to introduce mutations in essential codons or deletions of regulatory elements for structure/function analysis (Pepple et al., 2008; Perry, Boettiger, Bothma, & Levine, 2010; Enneking et al., 2013; Cassidy et al., 2013; Leonardi et al., 2011; Leonardi & Jafar‐Nejad, 2014), incorporate protein tags for visualization of protein expression or acute protein inactivation (Verstreken et al., 2005; Venken et al., 2008, 2009; Verstreken et al., 2009; Nègre et al., 2011; Ejsmont et al., 2009; Sarov et al., 2016; Avellaneda & Schnorrer, 2022), and integrate binary factors (e.g., GAL4 or QF) for cellular labeling (Stowers, 2011).…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, Nf1 knockdown in dopaminergic neurons using TH-Gal4 did not influence grooming behavior ( Fig 2L). However, the oct-tyrR-Gal4 [39] driver that labels a subset of neurons that express the oct-tyrR receptor, produced excessive grooming when used to knock down Nf1 ( Fig 2D). This driver labels a broadly-distributed but relatively sparse population of neurons in the brain ( Fig 2H) and VNS ( Fig 2I).…”
Section: Neurochemical Identity Of Nf1-sensitive Grooming Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%