2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00865.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient method for dispersing Ds elements in the barley genome as a tool for determining gene function

Abstract: SummaryTo devise a method for function-based gene isolation and characterization in barley, we created a plasmid containing the maize Activator (Ac) transposase (AcTPase) gene and a negative selection gene, codA, and a plasmid containing Dissociation (Ds) inverted-repeat ends surrounding the selectable herbicide resistance gene, bar. These plasmids were used to stably transform barley (Hordeum vulgare). In vitro assays, utilizing a Ds-interrupted uidA reporter gene, were used to demonstrate high-frequency exci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(68 reference statements)
2
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tendency of Ds to transpose to linked sites has also been exploited to disrupt genes present in tandem arrays (Takken et al 1999;Tantikanjana et al 2004) and to perform localized saturation mutagenesis (Nishal et al 2005). Ac/Ds mutagenesis platforms in Arabidopsis (Sundaresan et al 1995;Ito et al 1999;Muskett et al 2003;Kuromori et al 2004), tomato (Healy et al 1993;Knapp et al 1994;Meissner et al 2000), tobacco (Scofield et al 1992), rice (Chin et al 1999;Zheng-Ge et al 2003;Kim et al 2004;Kolesnik et al 2004), and barley (Koprek et al 2000;Cooper et al 2004) have been developed. Yet, despite the demonstrated utility of Ds in gene tagging in maize (Hake et al 1989;Colasanti et al 1998), a two-component Ac/Ds genetagging program for this important crop plant has not yet been developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tendency of Ds to transpose to linked sites has also been exploited to disrupt genes present in tandem arrays (Takken et al 1999;Tantikanjana et al 2004) and to perform localized saturation mutagenesis (Nishal et al 2005). Ac/Ds mutagenesis platforms in Arabidopsis (Sundaresan et al 1995;Ito et al 1999;Muskett et al 2003;Kuromori et al 2004), tomato (Healy et al 1993;Knapp et al 1994;Meissner et al 2000), tobacco (Scofield et al 1992), rice (Chin et al 1999;Zheng-Ge et al 2003;Kim et al 2004;Kolesnik et al 2004), and barley (Koprek et al 2000;Cooper et al 2004) have been developed. Yet, despite the demonstrated utility of Ds in gene tagging in maize (Hake et al 1989;Colasanti et al 1998), a two-component Ac/Ds genetagging program for this important crop plant has not yet been developed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that a single Ds-bar element can transpose from a multicopy locus to linked and unlinked sites. In the latter case the element can segregate away from the other copies of the Ds element and from the AcTPase gene (Koprek et al, 2000), physically stabilizing the element in its new location. The resulting single-copy element can be re-activated by providing AcTPase in trans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UbiIbar-nos cassette is flanked by a 254-bp 5Ј sequence and a 340-bp 3Ј sequence from Ds, derived from pDs7 (Wirtz et al, 1997) as a 0.59-kbp SalI-BamHI restriction fragment. The construction of the entire plasmid has been described in detail previously Koprek et al, 2000).…”
Section: Plasmidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the occasional transfer of resistance from plant to bacterium did occur, the practical impact would be negligible. However, since any increase in antibiotic resistance is recognized as undesirable and the technology is now available to omit the use of such marker genes, future genetically modified organisms are unlikely to contain them (e.g., see Goldsbrough et al, 1996;Koprek et al, 2000). Thus, concerns related to their use are likely to diminish.…”
Section: Does the Possible Transfer Of Antibiotic Resistance Marker Gmentioning
confidence: 99%