2001
DOI: 10.1137/s1064827598346740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Linear Solver for Nonlinear Parameter Identification Problems

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, we study some efficient numerical methods for parameter identifications in elliptic systems. The proposed numerical methods are conducted iteratively and each iteration involves only solving positive definite linear algebraic systems, although the original inverse problems are ill-posed and highly nonlinear. The positive definite systems can be naturally preconditioned with their corresponding block diagonal matrices. Numerical experiments are presented to illustrate the efficiency of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider an inverse elliptic problem [14]: Find the coefficient function ρ(x) in the system −∇ · (ρ∇u) = f, x ∈ , u(x) = 0, x ∈ ∂ .…”
Section: Msc2000: 65n21 65n55 65y05mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We consider an inverse elliptic problem [14]: Find the coefficient function ρ(x) in the system −∇ · (ρ∇u) = f, x ∈ , u(x) = 0, x ∈ ∂ .…”
Section: Msc2000: 65n21 65n55 65y05mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, our algorithms are not based on the structure of (13), but on the structure of (15), which is based on the ordering scheme (11) + (14). For the purpose of parallel processing, the mesh points are ordered subdomain by subdomain.…”
Section: Scalable Solversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case when the saddle-point problems arise from the domain decomposition method with Lagrange multiplier [27], [34], or from the Lagrange multiplier formulations for optimization problems [25] and the parameter identification [16], [33]. But the algorithm still does not seem satisfactory, as its convergence can be guaranteed only under some restriction; see (4.2) in [29].…”
Section: Then Compute the Relaxation Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, a lot of algorithms for solving the continuous parameter identification problem have been worked out, among which, three kinds of methods can be used. One of them is termed as the traditional mathematic and physical methods [1][2][3][4][5]. The second one is known as the evolutionary algorithms [6][7][8][9][10], and the numerical experiments indicate that these algorithms are good to solve inverse problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%