2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient level set model with self-similarity for texture segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 52 ]. Figure 6 shows the comparison results of FCM, LINC [ 38 ], MICO [ 39 ], ARKFCM [ 52 ] LIC [ 37 ] and WLSM on brain MRI images with 5% noise. FCM is very sensitive to noise, and the segmentation effect is poor.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 52 ]. Figure 6 shows the comparison results of FCM, LINC [ 38 ], MICO [ 39 ], ARKFCM [ 52 ] LIC [ 37 ] and WLSM on brain MRI images with 5% noise. FCM is very sensitive to noise, and the segmentation effect is poor.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is particularly effective for the image with clear boundaries. However, for the image with weak boundaries, the level set function is usually difficult to converge to the correct boundaries due to the destruction of noise and intensity inhomogeneity [ 37 ]. Li et al designed a distance regularized level set evolution (DRLSE) scheme [ 38 ], in which the image gradient information is used as driving force and regularization term is introduced into energy function to adjust the deviation between signed distance function and level set function to eliminate the defect of continuous re-initialization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, CNN-based methods with orderless feature pooling (Gong et al, 2014;Cimpoi et al, 2015;Zhang et al, 2017) have shown good performance on texture recognition, which was later proved to be beneficial for semantic segmentation (Zhang et al, 2018). In terms of texture segmentation, many approaches are based on active contours and integrate different texture features (Wu et al, 2015;Reska et al, 2015;Varnosfaderani and Moallem, 2017;Liu et al, 2017a;Yuan et al, 2015;Gao et al, 2016). Cimpoi et al (2015) proposed to use object detection-like region proposal classification to assign the texture/object labels to each pixel.…”
Section: Texture Recognition and Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major advantage of this approach is not limited to color. Liu et al [28] proposed a new segmenting method for texture image by using local Gaussian distribution fitting and local self-similarity that has a relatively low complexity. Subudhi et al [29] proposed a hybrid structural energy based on co-occurrence features of the image to evolve contour curves toward the desired texture boundary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%