2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2017.8296726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient intra coding algorithm based on statistical learning for screen content coding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the fast prediction rules in [24]- [28] do not utilize the information from the decoder side, and they rely on the assumption that the SCBs are noise-free, they show poor performance compared with the proposed CNN-BRT. Specifically, CBFT+Zhang [24], CBFT+Duanmu [25], CBFT+Lei [26], CBFT+Yang [27], and CBFT+Kuang [28] provides 31.83%, 30.15%, 31.61%, 22.00% and 41.62% with BDBR increased by 1.65%, 6.08%, 2.34%, 2.38%, and 4.59% on average, respectively. Although the fast bitrate transcoder of Zhang et al [29] utilizes both the decoder side information and the encoder side information, it shows inferior performance than the proposed CNN-BRT because it only derives limited hand-crafted rules to speed up the re-encoding process.…”
Section: B Performance Evaluation Of Cnn-brtmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the fast prediction rules in [24]- [28] do not utilize the information from the decoder side, and they rely on the assumption that the SCBs are noise-free, they show poor performance compared with the proposed CNN-BRT. Specifically, CBFT+Zhang [24], CBFT+Duanmu [25], CBFT+Lei [26], CBFT+Yang [27], and CBFT+Kuang [28] provides 31.83%, 30.15%, 31.61%, 22.00% and 41.62% with BDBR increased by 1.65%, 6.08%, 2.34%, 2.38%, and 4.59% on average, respectively. Although the fast bitrate transcoder of Zhang et al [29] utilizes both the decoder side information and the encoder side information, it shows inferior performance than the proposed CNN-BRT because it only derives limited hand-crafted rules to speed up the re-encoding process.…”
Section: B Performance Evaluation Of Cnn-brtmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Then, the bit cost and the depth information from the temporal and spatial neighboring CUs are utilized to early terminate CU partitions. In [27], Intra mode is firstly searched for all CUs with 2N×2N prediction units (PUs) to collect some features. Based on these features and CU content, incoming CUs are classified into partitioning CUs and non-partitioning CUs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the computational complexity of a HEVC to SCC transcoder, one possible way is to use various fast encoding algorithms [24]- [26] to replace the original SCC encoder of CBFT in Fig. 1 by utilizing SCC encoder side information only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not suitable for screen content videos with many dynamic regions. In [25] and [26], algorithms were proposed to make both fast mode decision and fast CU size decision. In [25], it classifies CUs into NIBs and SCBs by content analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation