2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3078065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient IDS Framework for DDoS Attacks in SDN Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [10], Eslamnezhad et al (2014) proposed novel IDSs based on MinMax KMCs to overcome starting center issues in KMCs and improving clustering quality. Their experimentations on NSL-KDD data set showed that their approach was more efficient than KMCs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10], Eslamnezhad et al (2014) proposed novel IDSs based on MinMax KMCs to overcome starting center issues in KMCs and improving clustering quality. Their experimentations on NSL-KDD data set showed that their approach was more efficient than KMCs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it needed to reduce false positive rate and switch buffer utilisation. According to Varghese et al, their proposed method was the first Data Plane Development Kit (DPDK) based DDoS defence framework built on single feature anomaly detection in SDN [11]. Instead of using an OVS switch, here DPDK-OVS switches were used.…”
Section: Related Work S Shin Et Al Developedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors [12] propose a lightweight approach to detect DDoS attacks aimed at resource-constrained environments such as IoT and shows that their lightweight random forest technique can achieve as high as 99% of detection accuracy. Varghese et al [13] proposed a statistical anomaly detection algorithm implemented in the data plane of Software Defined Network (SDN) to detect DDoS attacks near real-time as a part of an Intrusion Detection System (IDS). Pontes et al [14] propose an Energy-based Flow Classifier (EFC) which utilizes inverse statistics to infer anomaly scores base on labeled benign examples.…”
Section: A Machine Learning Based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22], [23]. Many state-of-the-VOLUME 4, 2016 [6] KNN, NB, RF, SVM IDS 98.86 ≈ 99.54 (Accuracy) CICDDoS2017 Ullah et al [7] NB, LR, DT, RF IoT 99.99 ≈ 100 (F1-score) IoT Botnet Gohil et al [8] DT, NB, LR, SVM, KNN IDS 97.72 ≈ 99.99 (Accuracy) CICDDoS2019 Alamri et al [9] XGBoost SDN 99.9 (Accuracy) CICDDoS2019 Khoei et al [10] Stacking, Bagging, Boosting Smart Grid 92.2 ≈ 93.4 (Accuracy) CICDDoS2019 Parfenov et al [11] Gradient Boosting IDS 96.8 (F1-score) CICDDoS2019 Parfenov et al [11] CatBoost IDS 96.9 (F1-score) CICDDoS2019 Sanchez et al [12] Random Forest IoT 99.97 (Accuracy) CICDDoS2019 Varghese et al [13] D3 SDN 84.54 (Accuracy) CICDDoS2019 Pontes et al [14] EFC IDS 97.5 (F1-score) CICDDoS2019…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%