2013
DOI: 10.12989/scs.2013.15.5.519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient genetic algorithm for the design optimization of cold-formed steel portal frame buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, previous studies indicated that the serviceability criteria can govern the design of CFS frame systems especially in low-seismic regions, e.g. under wind loads [27]. Violation of serviceability requirements (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, previous studies indicated that the serviceability criteria can govern the design of CFS frame systems especially in low-seismic regions, e.g. under wind loads [27]. Violation of serviceability requirements (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maintain the diversity of population when generation progresses, a niching technique is applied for selection and crossover operators. The details of this process can be found in Phan et al [13].…”
Section: Real-coded Genetic Algorithm (Rc-ga)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While optimum design of CFS elements has been extensively investigated in the past, considerably less research has been conducted on optimisation of CFS structural systems. In one of the few studies available in this area, Phan et al [13,14] used Genetic Algorithm (GA) to optimise CFS portal frames with small to medium spans and reported a variation of optimal geometry in terms of pitch and frame spacing for a range of typical column heights. In a follow-up study, it was shown that by taking into account the effects of stressed-skin action (owing to the stiffening effect of roof diaphragm) in the optimisation process, the material cost of the CFS portal frame structural system can be noticeably (up to 53%) reduced [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the optimization purpose, crosssectional areas of the members and/or nodal coordinates separately or simultaneously can be included as the design variables of the problem. Phan et al (2013), Gholizadeh and Fattahi (2014), Gholizadeh and Poorhoseini (2015), Kaveh and Shokohi (2015), Gholizadeh (2015) and Artar (2016) applied some metaheuristic algorithms for the design optimization problems including the sizing variable only. Although it is possible to obtain better results taking into account both sizing and layout variables, in such a case the optimization problem becomes more complex due to rising number of variables (Hasançebi et al 2009;Tang et al 2005;Miguel et al 2013;Silih et al 2010;Deb, Gulati 2001;Dede, Ayvaz 2015;Bekdaş et al 2015;Aydın, Çakır 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%