2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2013.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient expanding block algorithm for image copy-move forgery detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table I presents the performance of PCM algorithm compared to four other algorithms; DCT [1], EB [4], PCA [5] and CRMS [6] algorithms.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table I presents the performance of PCM algorithm compared to four other algorithms; DCT [1], EB [4], PCA [5] and CRMS [6] algorithms.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this experiment, the average execution time for 1000 forged images used in this research. Table I presents the time performance of PCM algorithm compared to DCT [1], EB [4], PCA [5] and CRMS [6] algorithms. It is noticed that PCM takes the highest execution time while CRMS has the lowest.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DyWT is scale invariant and hence it is robust to attack like scaling. Many other researchers have also worked on copy move forgery detection techniques to improve the computational efficiency, flexibility and robustness of the algorithm including Akbarpour et al [18], Lynch et al [19], Zhao et al [20], Li et al [21] and Ketenci et al [22]. Hashmi et al [30] has been presented comprehensive technique for detection of any type of image forgery.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%