2019
DOI: 10.3390/computers8020046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Energy-Aware Tasks Scheduling with Deadline-Constrained in Cloud Computing

Abstract: Nowadays, Cloud Computing (CC) has emerged as a new paradigm for hosting and delivering services over the Internet. However, the wider deployment of Cloud and the rapid increase in the capacity, as well as the size of data centers, induces a tremendous rise in electricity consumption, escalating data center ownership costs and increasing carbon footprints. This expanding scale of data centers has made energy consumption an imperative issue. Besides, users’ requirements regarding execution time, deadline, QoS h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ben Alla et al [33] EATSD Reduce the energy consumption of the cloud resources and optimize the makespan under the deadlines constraints Peng et al [34] DQN e framework for trade-off optimization energy consumption and task makespan Yao et al [35] EnMORL Simultaneously minimize the makespan and energy consumption while meeting the budget constraint Singh et al [36] EEWS Minimizing makespan and maximizing energy conservation while scheduling workflow Belgacem et al [37] S-MOAL Minimize both the makespan and the cost of using virtual machines Importance factor determined by the end-user or service provider task j mki Task j assigned to core i of the virtual machine k in the node m time init j Initial time of the task j time setup j Setup time of the task j time end j End time of the task j T Prej A set of prerequisite tasks for the task j time pre j Start time of the task j prerequisite time end pre End time of task j prerequisites time transfe Data transfer times required to perform a task that is outside the virtual machine time exec j Processing time of a task j in the core i of the virtual machine k of the node m e taskmki Energy consumed by a task j e transfer mk Energy consumed by the data transfer of the task j e vmk Energy consumed by the virtual machine k e task mk Energy consumption by various tasks j in a virtual machine k e nm Energy consumption per node e net Average data transfer power in cloud infrastructure…”
Section: Problem Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ben Alla et al [33] EATSD Reduce the energy consumption of the cloud resources and optimize the makespan under the deadlines constraints Peng et al [34] DQN e framework for trade-off optimization energy consumption and task makespan Yao et al [35] EnMORL Simultaneously minimize the makespan and energy consumption while meeting the budget constraint Singh et al [36] EEWS Minimizing makespan and maximizing energy conservation while scheduling workflow Belgacem et al [37] S-MOAL Minimize both the makespan and the cost of using virtual machines Importance factor determined by the end-user or service provider task j mki Task j assigned to core i of the virtual machine k in the node m time init j Initial time of the task j time setup j Setup time of the task j time end j End time of the task j T Prej A set of prerequisite tasks for the task j time pre j Start time of the task j prerequisite time end pre End time of task j prerequisites time transfe Data transfer times required to perform a task that is outside the virtual machine time exec j Processing time of a task j in the core i of the virtual machine k of the node m e taskmki Energy consumed by a task j e transfer mk Energy consumed by the data transfer of the task j e vmk Energy consumed by the virtual machine k e task mk Energy consumption by various tasks j in a virtual machine k e nm Energy consumption per node e net Average data transfer power in cloud infrastructure…”
Section: Problem Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the method proposed in this paper considers makespan and energy consumption for various elements such as cores, virtual machines, and nodes. Ben Alla et al [33] proposed efficient energy-aware task scheduling with deadline-constrained in cloud computing (EATSD). e main objective of their proposed solution is to reduce the energy consumption of the cloud resources, consider different end-user priorities, and optimize the makespan within the deadline constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also combines power‐aware list‐based scheduling algorithm with dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS) technique for real‐time tasks to maintain the quality of service while considering tasks deadlines 13 Energy aware for tasks scheduling with deadline constraint (EATSD): This approach is based on considering different users' priorities and deadlines constraints that can allocate the resources on the basis of their class as well as the class of received tasks so that the energy consumption is reduced 34 …”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some other algorithms, data-intensive tasks are scheduled within specific deadlines to guarantee the service quality and reduce energy consumption. In Ben et al, 23 tasks and virtual machines (VMs) are categorized into multiple classes by the dynamic classifier. The task scheduler at each level is mapped to a suitable VM class.…”
Section: Job Scheduling Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The files are deleted from the top of the list until the needed storage space is made available. This valuation is performed according to Equation (23), where fileValue f,i , CT, LRT, FR, AFCost f,i,k , S f , and NFSQ i are respectively the value of file f in site i, the current time, the last request time, the file access frequency, the average cost of remote access to the file, the size of file f, and the number of existing access requests to file f in the current storage disk queue. w 1 , w 2 , and w 3 are the empirical weighting factors.…”
Section: Replica Replacementmentioning
confidence: 99%