2017
DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Electroporation Protocol for the Genetic Modification of Mammalian Cells

Abstract: Genetic modification of cell lines and primary cells is an expensive and cumbersome approach, often involving the use of viral vectors. Electroporation using square-wave generating devices, like Lonza’s Nucleofector, is a widely used option, but the costs associated with the acquisition of electroporation kits and the transient transgene expression might hamper the utility of this methodology. In the present work, we show that our in-house developed buffers, termed Chicabuffers, can be efficiently used to elec… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, for the first time, it is possible to chemically transfect Jurkat cells with both a transfection efficiency and a viability above 80%. Such results have only been obtained so far with nucleofection kits [35], which are associated with high costs and might not be suitable for large-scale experiments.…”
Section: Adaptation Of the Standard Protocol To Eppendorf Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, for the first time, it is possible to chemically transfect Jurkat cells with both a transfection efficiency and a viability above 80%. Such results have only been obtained so far with nucleofection kits [35], which are associated with high costs and might not be suitable for large-scale experiments.…”
Section: Adaptation Of the Standard Protocol To Eppendorf Tubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While considerably better, than anything l-PEI can produce, the low viability in particular is a concern, since any attempt to improve this value must be expected to dramatically reduce the transfection efficiency. For comparison, the Nucleofection technology has been reported to reach transfection efficiencies of >85% at 90% viability [35].…”
Section: Optimization Of the Standard Transfection Protocol For Jurkamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the pulse amplitude, rise-time and fall time of the bell-shaped voltage pulse are important and are recommended to be clearly specified (Cemazar et al 2018). There are also several studies performed, which suggests, that the square-wave and exponential decay pulses have higher efficiency in comparison with other type of pulses (Chicaybam et al 2017;Miklavcic et al 2010).…”
Section: Waveformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanger sequencing confirmed successful cloning. 1 μg of each luciferase plasmid and 15 ng of Promega's pNL1·1·TK vector (#N1501) were conucleofected into 1 × 10 6 HUT78 cells with an Amaxa Nucleofector 2b system using the X-001 program and a homemade nucleofection buffer (SM1) as described [15]. Cells were incubated for 24 h in IMDM (Gibco) supplemented with 20% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin, centrifuged at 200g for 10 min, and resuspended in 200 μL media.…”
Section: Luciferase Reporter Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%