2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-6861-5_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Detection of Malware by Naive Bayes Classifier Using GPGPU

Abstract: Due to continuous increase in the number of malware (according to AV-Test institute total ∼ 8 × 10 8 malware are already known, and every day they register ∼ 2.5 × 10 4 malware) and files in the computational devices, it is very important to design a system which not only effectively but can also efficiently detect the new or previously unseen malware to prevent/minimize the damages. Therefore, this paper presents a novel group-wise approach for the efficient detection of malware by parallelizing the classific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for malware detection by Sahay and Chaudhari (2019), among many other authors. NB requires short computational time for training compared with others and also, it is highly scalable, see Ashari et al (2013).…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…for malware detection by Sahay and Chaudhari (2019), among many other authors. NB requires short computational time for training compared with others and also, it is highly scalable, see Ashari et al (2013).…”
Section: Trainingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Range of Detection Accuracy Rate K-Means [53], [54] 88% -> 90% NB [29], [38], [39], [40], [41], [54], [57], Pang, [58], [59], [60], [61], [74], [84], [91], [97], [101] 73.01% -98% SVM [36], [39], [40], [41], [45], [46], [47], [48], [51], [55], [61], [64], [65], [75], [78], [79], [80], [81], [82], [83], [84], [85], [86], [94], [95], [99], [100], [101] 64.7% -100% DT [29], [33], [34], [35]<...…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, [56], [57], [60], [61], [64], [66], [67], [69], [70], [71], [76], [81], [83], [84], [85], [87], [88], [90], [94], [96], [100], [101], [102], [105], [109], [113], [119], [121], [125] Signaturebased false positive rate and raising the false negative rate overcomes the limitations of heuristic-based approaches.…”
Section: D: Specification-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, we consider as benchmark an NB classifier (Lewis, 1998). This classifier has been used for malware detection by Sahay and Chaudhari (2019), among many other authors. NB requires short computational time for training compared with others and also, it is highly scalable (see Ashari, Paryudi, & Tjoa, 2013).…”
Section: A Framework To Protect From Malware Using a Hybrid Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%