An efficient depth-based forwarding protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks

Liu, Xiaoyang; Liu, Peishun; Long, Tianli; Lv, Ze; Tang, Ruichun

doi:10.1109/icccbda.2018.8386561

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The energy utilization, data dissipation frequency and system performance is relying on robustness of the connection. Indeed, the protocol based on the expected transmission count (ETX) [22], measures the consistency of the communication between two directions of each path during the transfer process. These protocols use GPS locational information or gather finite data from the sink point, while suggested technique (URR-SAEP) decides the link level in its best way by taking some step.…”

Section: B Link Factormentioning

confidence: 99%

Underwater Resurrection Routing Synergy using Astucious Energy Pods

Ashraf

Raza

Aslam

et al. 2020

jrc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The accomplishment of sustainable communication among source and destination sink node is a rigors challenge and even establishing bodacious communication link between these nodes is nothing short of a miracle because data routes are governed by the underwater environment. Energy consumption has a significant influence as all active devices rely on the battery. As cost-effective data packet transmission is established as a norm, no charging or replacement can be achieved. Hop link evaluation and shrewd connection discovery by way of a resurrecting linking element were just a genuinely grim task, and only feasible to create the extra powered energy pods (URR-SAEP) that had never been carried out before after detailed study. After packet transfer, the sensor node performs the link inspection process, and when a link is deemed shaky at less than or equivalent to 50 percent of capacity, the target node incorporates its residual capacity status and returns it to the source node that attaches other unoptimizable energy pods to improve only the targeted node link from 50 percent to 90 percent. Performance evaluation using NS2 with Aqua-Sim 2.0 simulator has been obtained comparing with DBR and EEDBR protocols in terms of point-to-point delay, Packet dissemination ratio, Network lifespan and Energy Diminution.

show abstract

Section: B Link Factormentioning

confidence: 99%

Underwater Resurrection Routing Synergy using Astucious Energy Pods

Ashraf

Raza

Aslam

et al. 2020

jrc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this case, the multi-copy problem can be avoided and thus energy can be saved. EDBF [23] uses a depth-based forwarding mechanism to select next-hop with three parameters: depth of the forwarding node, residual energy and forwarding quality. It reduces communication overhead, but in determining forwarding quality, the end-to-end delivery ratio does not improve significantly.…”

Section: Energy-efficient Transmission Protocolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Co-Design-Based Reliable Low-Latency and Energy-Efficient Transmission Protocol for UWSNs

Wei

Guo

Wang

et al. 2020

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs) have been considered as a powerful technique for many applications. However, acoustic communications in UWSNs bring in huge QoS issues for time-critical applications. Additionally, excessive control packets and multiple copies during the data transmission process exacerbate this challenge. Faced with these problems, we propose a reliable low-latency and energy-efficient transmission protocol for dense 3D underwater wireless sensor networks to improve the QoS of UWSNs. The proposed protocol exploits fewer control packets and reduces data-packet copies effectively through the co-design of routing and media access control (MAC) protocols. The co-design method is divided into two steps. First, the number of handshakes in the MAC process will be greatly reduced via our forwarding-set routing strategy under the guarantee of reliability. Second, with the help of information from the MAC process, network-update messages can be used to replace control packages through mobility prediction when choosing a route. Simulation results show that the proposed protocol has a considerably higher reliability, and lower latency and energy consumption in comparison with existing transmission protocols for a dense underwater wireless sensor network.

show abstract

“…EDBF [55] is a depth-based forwarding mechanism. It selects next hop based on three parameters: (1) Depth of the forwarding node: a node whose depth is smaller than the sender is selected as a forwarder; (2) Residual energy: this prolongs network lifetime by achieving balanced load distribution, which results in preventing the creation of communication void; and (3) Forwarding quality; the forwarding quality of a node is determined based on link or node failures, the presence or absence of connectivity voids, etc.…”

Section: Routing Protocols For Uwsnsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comprehensive Survey of Recent Routing Protocols for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks

Islam

Lee

2019

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Underwater Sensor Networks (UWSN) have attracted huge attention due to their significance in oceanic observation and exploration. They offer a vast number of applications, many of which require routing the sensed data to a centralized location. This makes routing an important part of the design of such applications. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of recently proposed routing protocols for UWSNs. We evaluate the proposed schemes through an extensive set of parameters that define the core characteristics of a routing protocol. Moreover, we present a summary of the methods used by each scheme to familiarize readers with the basic operations of the schemes. We also present our view of the strengths and weakness of each scheme. For ease of description, the addressed routing protocols are divided into two categories: localization-based, and localization-free routing schemes. Each of the two categories is further divided into the protocols that consider node mobility, and those that do not. Lastly, we present our view on open research topics.

show abstract

An efficient depth-based forwarding protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks

Cited by 8 publications

References 21 publications

Underwater Resurrection Routing Synergy using Astucious Energy Pods

Underwater Resurrection Routing Synergy using Astucious Energy Pods

A Co-Design-Based Reliable Low-Latency and Energy-Efficient Transmission Protocol for UWSNs

A Comprehensive Survey of Recent Routing Protocols for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About