“…However, in an Adaptive Allocation Scheduling Problem, with consideration of disruptions, reassigning decisions (i.e., planning phase decisions) should be made along with rescheduling and resequencing decisions (i.e., scheduling phase decisions), preferably with limited changes in the preliminary schedule. There is quite some earlier work on Allocation Scheduling Problems with making assignment decisions along with (i) daily or (ii) weekly scheduling and sequencing decisions, e.g., (i): Jebali, Alouane, and Ladet (2006), Denton, Viapiano, and Voglet (2007), Pham and Klinkert (2008), Batun, Denton, Huschka, and Schaefer (2011), Ghazalbash, Sepehri, Shadpour, and Atighehchian (2012), Meskens, Duvivier, and Hanset (2013), Xiang, Yin, and Lim (2015), Latorre-Núñez et al (2016), and Bam, Denton, van Oyen, and Cowen (2017), (ii): Guinet and Chaabane (2003), Roland, Di Martinelly, Riane, and Pochet (2010), Fei, Meskens, and Chu (2006), Fei et al (2010), Vaz Pato (2012, Marques, Captivo, andPato (2014), Molina-Pariente, Fernandez-Viagas, and Framinan (2015), Roshanaei, Luong, Aleman, and Urbach (2017), and Noorizadegan and Seifi (2018). But the concept of adaptivity to unexpected disruptions has not been addressed in these researches, thus, reviewing them in detail is beyond the scope of this study.…”