2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/127580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Compact Finite Difference Method for the Solution of the Gross-Pitaevskii Equation

Abstract: We present an efficient, unconditionally stable, and accurate numerical method for the solution of the Gross-Pitaevskii equation. We begin with an introduction on the gradient flow with discrete normalization (GFDN) for computing stationary states of a nonconvex minimization problem. Then we present a new numerical method, CFDM-AIF method, which combines compact finite difference method (CFDM) in space and array-representation integration factor (AIF) method in time. The key features of our methods are as foll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of high-order finite differences, compact finite difference methods feature high-order accuracy and smaller stencils [1,6,10,13,17]. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in the development and application of compact finite difference methods for the numerical solution of the nonlinear Schrodinger equation [2,18], advectiondiffusion equation [7], and generalized RLW equation [9]. It is evident that they are not only accurate and cost effective but also provide easier treatment of boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of high-order finite differences, compact finite difference methods feature high-order accuracy and smaller stencils [1,6,10,13,17]. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in the development and application of compact finite difference methods for the numerical solution of the nonlinear Schrodinger equation [2,18], advectiondiffusion equation [7], and generalized RLW equation [9]. It is evident that they are not only accurate and cost effective but also provide easier treatment of boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%