2014
DOI: 10.1002/nem.1857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient approach to reduce alerts generated by multiple IDS products

Abstract: Intrusion detection systems (IDSs) often trigger a huge number of unnecessary alerts. Managing the overwhelming number of alerts, especially from multiple IDS products, is a concern to every security analyst. Analyzing and evaluating these alerts is a difficult task that frustrates the effort of analysts. In fact, true alerts are usually buried under heaps of false alerts. We have identified several research gaps in the existing alert management approaches that need to be addressed, especially when handling al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of intrusion detection, the false/missed alarm (FPR or FNR) is an important metric: a high rate of false alarms disturbs the security staff attention and increases the chance of a missed attack. The minimization of such events is an essential field of IDS research [95]. This metric demonstrates (Table 6) that AWSCTD family models have an advantage against the FCN family: the AWSCTD-CNN-GRU model has the best FPR of 0.018 for 1000 system calls sequence, while LSTM-FCN has the best value of 0.027 for the same sequence, i.e., 50% worse.…”
Section: Fpr and Fnrmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the context of intrusion detection, the false/missed alarm (FPR or FNR) is an important metric: a high rate of false alarms disturbs the security staff attention and increases the chance of a missed attack. The minimization of such events is an essential field of IDS research [95]. This metric demonstrates (Table 6) that AWSCTD family models have an advantage against the FCN family: the AWSCTD-CNN-GRU model has the best FPR of 0.018 for 1000 system calls sequence, while LSTM-FCN has the best value of 0.027 for the same sequence, i.e., 50% worse.…”
Section: Fpr and Fnrmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Regrettably, the method is not tested with any datasets. An alert management approach with enhanced alert verification and alert aggregator modules were proposed to reduce the alerts quantity wherein the method produces inefficient clustering [12]. A correlation based alert processing model was introduced with an ample set of components.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mitigate this variation, we employ an ensemble anomaly detection method [8] that exploits the multiple baseline models trained using multiple sets of labeled-and-sampled/sampled-andlabeled data. A similar idea proposed in [25][26][27] exploits multiple existing anomaly detection systems in parallel. Since the multiple sets of labeled-andsampled/sampled-and-labeled data would have information about different features of the normal behavior of network traffic, the ensemble of the multiple baseline models trained using these heterogeneous data improves performance in anomaly detection more effectively than using a single baseline model.…”
Section: Ensemble Anomaly Detection Using Multiple Baseline Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%