2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9163337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Anomaly Detection System for Crowded Scenes Using Variational Autoencoders

Abstract: Anomaly detection in crowded scenes is an important and challenging part of the intelligent video surveillance system. As the deep neural networks make success in feature representation, the features extracted by a deep neural network represent the appearance and motion patterns in different scenes more specifically, comparing with the hand-crafted features typically used in the traditional anomaly detection approaches. In this paper, we propose a new baseline framework of anomaly detection for complex surveil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It reports the average running time of each frame during the test phase. Our method is significantly faster than MDT [ 6 ], AMDN [ 3 ], Xu et al’s method without GPU [ 61 ], and Hierarchical framework [ 62 ]. Our method is also faster than ST-CNN [ 63 ], AED [ 64 ], and ICN [ 65 ].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It reports the average running time of each frame during the test phase. Our method is significantly faster than MDT [ 6 ], AMDN [ 3 ], Xu et al’s method without GPU [ 61 ], and Hierarchical framework [ 62 ]. Our method is also faster than ST-CNN [ 63 ], AED [ 64 ], and ICN [ 65 ].…”
Section: Experimental Results and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wheelchair is also considered an anomaly in a different scene. The dataset is divided into two subsets and each video contains different clips [29]. The video segment contains 200 frames in each clip of the video which is almost 6 to 7 s of time duration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, one branch is in charge of frame reconstruction (capturing spatial dependency) and the other one attempts to estimate the optical flow map, to capture motion dependency, customized for the task. Different models that have been applied for representation learning or reconstruction-based anomaly detection are as follows: PCA [67], classic AE [62], Conv-AE [62], Contractive-AE [68], Conv-LSTM-AE [17], [22], Hybrid Spatio-Temporal Autoencoder [69], Denoising AEs [70] and VAE [71], GRU-AE [72]. Some of the other examples in this field are [57], [73], [74], [75], [76].…”
Section: Reconstruction-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%