2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41524-017-0046-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient and accurate framework for calculating lattice thermal conductivity of solids: AFLOW—AAPL Automatic Anharmonic Phonon Library

Abstract: One of the most accurate approaches for calculating lattice thermal conductivity, κ ' , is solving the Boltzmann transport equation starting from third-order anharmonic force constants. In addition to the underlying approximations of ab-initio parameterization, two main challenges are associated with this path: high computational costs and lack of automation in the frameworks using this methodology, which affect the discovery rate of novel materials with ad-hoc properties. Here, the Automatic Anharmonic Phonon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lattice thermal conductivity data were compiled from several resources. 47,49,51,[53][54][55][56][57] The dataset was cleaned in the following procedure. For the materials studied in ref.…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lattice thermal conductivity data were compiled from several resources. 47,49,51,[53][54][55][56][57] The dataset was cleaned in the following procedure. For the materials studied in ref.…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, other representations, such as the AFLOW standard primitive representation [4], are often preferred for reducing the computational cost of subsequent calculations/analyses, such as density functional theory calculations [4]. While conversions are always possible, as was done to find the standard conventional cell, in practice it introduces errors in the structural parameters, becoming particularly problematic in "confusion" tolerance regions ( Figure 2) and tolerance-sensitive algorithms, e.g., calculations of force constants [9,42]. To mitigate the need for error-accumulating conversions, a general-representation symmetry algorithm is also incorporated in AFLOW-SYM.…”
Section: E Input Orientation Symmetry Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFLOW-SYM offers the symmetry operations in the rotation matrix (cartesian and fractional), axis-angle, generator, and quaternion representations [49,50]; while Spglib only provides the rotation matrix representation in its fractional form. AFLOW-SYM also presents the corresponding mappings for each symmetry operation, almost entirely eliminating the need to reapply the operators for symmetry-reduced analyses such as calculating the force constants [9,42]. Along with the factor group coset representatives, AFLOW-SYM provides the lattice point group, reciprocal lattice point group, crystal point group, dual of the crystal point group, site point group, and space group symmetry operators.…”
Section: B Symmetry Characterizations and Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations