2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-016-2281-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient algorithm for large-scale causal discovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With hundreds of time-series (or hundreds of static nodes), the potential possibility for causal relations grows exponentially. Existing approaches may fail because they involve either massive conditional independence tests (Runge et al 2019), too many variables to be conditioned on (Hong, Liu, and Mai 2017), or large quantities of parameters to be optimized (Tank et al 2022;Cheng et al 2023). To solve this problem, scalable or high-dimensional causal discovery approaches are proposed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With hundreds of time-series (or hundreds of static nodes), the potential possibility for causal relations grows exponentially. Existing approaches may fail because they involve either massive conditional independence tests (Runge et al 2019), too many variables to be conditioned on (Hong, Liu, and Mai 2017), or large quantities of parameters to be optimized (Tank et al 2022;Cheng et al 2023). To solve this problem, scalable or high-dimensional causal discovery approaches are proposed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, scalable or high-dimensional causal discovery approaches are proposed. In static settings, Hong, Liu, and Mai (2017) and Morales-Alvarez et al (2022) propose to boost scalability via divide-and-conquer technique, Lopez et al (2022) limit the search space to low-rank factor graphs, Cundy, Grover, and Ermon (2021) instead leverages variational framework. In time-series settings like ours, the scalability issue is less explored.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 1 [13] Two DAGs with the same node set are said to Markov equivalent if they contain the same set of vstructures.…”
Section: Bayesian Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al 11 proposed a causal discovery algorithm to discover causal rules in large databases. Hong et al 12 proposed the LSCD framework, which uses a graph‐partitioning method and infer the causality of each subdataset. Ma et al 13 proposed two efficient algorithms to mine the combined causes from large data sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%