2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2009.5459261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An efficient algorithm for Co-segmentation

Abstract: This paper is focused on the Co-segmentation problem [1] -where the objective is to segment a similar object from a pair of images. The background in the two images may be arbitrary; therefore, simultaneous segmentation of both images must be performed with a requirement that the appearance of the two sets of foreground pixels in the respective images are consistent. Existing approaches [1,2] cast this problem as a Markov Random Field (MRF) based segmentation of the image pair with a regularized difference of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
219
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
219
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us be more precise on the definition of the "same" foreground object. In this paper we use the definition of [1][2][3] where the only constraint is that the distribution of some appearance features of the foreground region in each image have to be similar. The appearance features can encode different information, like color and texture, and various similarity measures can be envisioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us be more precise on the definition of the "same" foreground object. In this paper we use the definition of [1][2][3] where the only constraint is that the distribution of some appearance features of the foreground region in each image have to be similar. The appearance features can encode different information, like color and texture, and various similarity measures can be envisioned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no comparison of such models and corresponding optimization techniques has been done so far. We analyze three existing models: the L1 norm model of Rother et al [1], the L2 norm model of Mukherjee et al [2] and the "reward" model of Hochbaum and Singh [3]. We also study a new model, which is a straightforward extension of the Boykov-Jolly model for single image segmentation [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At one end of the spectrum are methods that assume strong agreement in the inputs' foregrounds, i.e., that the two images contain the same exact object against differing backgrounds [1]. This setting continues to be developed, e.g., for greater efficiency [12] and multi-image collections with interactive user input [13]. In the middle of the spectrum is the weakly supervised scenario, where the input images are assumed to contain instances of the same object category [2,9,10,[3][4][5][6][7][8], and the goal is to extract the foreground per image (or possibly multiple foreground objects [6,7]).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the strict same-object cosegmentation setting, this is assured by manually selecting the input pair (or set). For example, a designer may supply a set of images to be rotoscoped [1], or an analyst may gather aligned brain images from which to segment pathologies [12], or a consumer may group a burst of photos at an event (e.g., a soccer game) into a mini-album [13]. In the weakly supervised setting, the related images often originate from Internet search for an object's name.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation