Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2018.2819658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient Acyclic Contact Planner for Multiped Robots

Abstract: We present a contact planner for complex legged locomotion tasks: standing up, climbing stairs using a handrail, crossing rubble and getting out of a car. The need for such a planner was shown at the Darpa Robotics Challenge, where such behaviors could not be demonstrated (except for egress). Current planners suffer from their prohibitive algorithmic complexity, because they deploy a tree of robot configurations projected in contact with the environment. We tackle this issue by introducing a reduction property… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
137
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the motions were computed offline. Contact sequence [25] and the centroidal trajectory [30] are precomputed and provided to the solver for the large stride experiments. We used the standard controller OpenHRP [31] for tracking the motions on the real robot.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the motions were computed offline. Contact sequence [25] and the centroidal trajectory [30] are precomputed and provided to the solver for the large stride experiments. We used the standard controller OpenHRP [31] for tracking the motions on the real robot.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policy Learning. Modeling contact interactions and multicontact planning still result in complex optimization problems [51,52,64] that remain sensitive to inaccurate actuation and state estimation. We formulate contact-rich manipulation as a model-free reinforcement learning problem to investigate its performance when relying on multimodal feedback and when acting under uncertainty (such as uncertain geometry, clearance, and configuration for our peg insertion task).…”
Section: Policy Learning and Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reinforcement learning has shown more and more impressive results during the last few years [17,18] but, as of yet, the results are limited to either flat ground or to behaviors that are unsuitable for real robot hardware on other terrains. In this paper, we apply the work of Steve Tonneau et al [19] on our robotic platform, ANYmal [20], and explain some of the adjustments that need to be done to successfully compute feasible contact plans.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, an algorithm analyses the environment to extract the set of possible contact surfaces. The planning problem is then decomposed into two subproblems, as described in [19]; the algorithm searches for a trajectory of the main body of the robot, then contacts are created along this trajectory. This decomposition allows for a considerable reduction in problem complexity, as after the trajectory for the main body is found each limb is considered separately.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%