2009 3rd International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security 2009
DOI: 10.1109/ntms.2009.5384750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Efficient 3D Face Recognition Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, with approximately the same number of probe images, we achieved a higher rate compared to the Mpiperis et al [15]. Kaushik et al [16] reported above 98% recognition rate which seems is better than our result but they have used a limited number of probes. Furthermore, our result is similar to Lie et al [7].…”
Section: Recognition Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In addition, with approximately the same number of probe images, we achieved a higher rate compared to the Mpiperis et al [15]. Kaushik et al [16] reported above 98% recognition rate which seems is better than our result but they have used a limited number of probes. Furthermore, our result is similar to Lie et al [7].…”
Section: Recognition Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In statistical models that are derived from 3-D shapes, ICP often provides correspondence information, as in [90] (combined with features for initialization), [91] (on the rigid parts of the face) and [92] (with extra energy terms for regularization and larger convergence area). In [93], anatomic landmarks are detected as correspondence information.…”
Section: B Statistical Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, model fitting becomes computationally more demanding. Other statistical models use independent component analysis (ICA) [44], linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [88] or simply pointwise mean and standard deviation [93].…”
Section: B Statistical Modeling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the performance of algorithm in Ref. [49] is slightly superior to that of the proposed approach, the average number of each subject in the gallery set in their experiments is 6.95, which is more than one.…”
Section: Experiments On Bu-3dfe Datasetmentioning
confidence: 90%