An Effectual Perspective On How Social Entrepreneurs Select, Combine, And Orchestrate Resources

Onishi, Tamaki; Burkemper, Andrew C.; Micelotta, Evelyn; Wales, William J.

doi:10.5465/ambpp.2018.2

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Also defining the way the entrepreneur do entrepreneurial activities, the identity of the entrepreneurs, according to the effectuation perspective, shape the combination of resources strategies, which brings to the proposition of the concept of resource mobilization based on identity (Onishi et al, 2018). Estrada-Cruz, Verdu-Jover & Gomez-Gras (2019) reminded that the theory of effectuation breaks up the assumption of opportunities, preexisting markets etc.…”

Section: Analysis and Discussion Of Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is central, in the studied literature, the notion that identity plays an important role in effectuation as a booster and guide of thoughts, decisions and behaviors directed to entrepreneurial activities, including definitions regarding the products offered by the businesses (e.g. as shown by York, O'Neil & Sarasvathy, 2016) and regarding the interest and the way to act as an entrepreneur (Onishi et al, 2018). When effectuation is used, identity also influences the preparation of students to undertake, once they experience an entrepreneurial identity and its potentials during an entrepreneurship education supported by effectuation (Gunzel-Jensen & Robinson, 2017).…”

Section: Discussion With More Publications In Addition To the Slrmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1) Studies about social identity and formation of social value in the social entrepreneurship (York, O'Neil & Sarasvathy, 2016;Alsos, Clausen, Hytti & Solvoll, 2016;Estrada-Cruz, Verdu-Jover & Gomez-Gras, 2017;2019;Onishi, Burkemper, Micelotta & Wales, 2018); 2) Studies about identity related to the lifestyle entrepreneurs, evaluating how and why these entrepreneurs do what they do (Popp, 2016;Lima, 2022;Lima, Nelson & Lopes, 2020;Wallis, Walmsley, Beaumont & Sutton, 2020;Horst, Thesleff, & Latre, 2019); 3) Studies about personal identity in interaction and in complement with the effectual means of knowledge and relations (Obrecht, 2011;Watson, 2013;Obrecht, 2016;York, O'Neil & Sarasvathy, 2016;Martina, 2019;Kerr & Coviello, 2020); 4) Understanding identity as a motivational instrument and force for the effectual behavior, mainly in its dynamics regarding business strategies (Nielsen & Lassen, 2012;Haller, Santoni & Barth, 2017;Martina, 2019;Mattes & Freiling, 2019;Cannatelli, Pedrini & Braun, 2019;Kerr & Coviello, 2020).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Effectuation and identity in entrepreneurship: A systematic review

Silva

Lima

2023

Contextus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The study aimed to analyze the existing literature on the identity of the entrepreneur in connection with effectuation, characterizing the state of the art of research on the subject. A systematic literature review was carried out, which searched for publications indexed by Scopus (23 articles) and Web of Science (37 articles) from the last 21 years, being operationalized with the StArt tool. The results show that, with effectuation, the identity of the entrepreneur influences decisions, the type of opportunity explored, the objectives and the commitment of partners in the entrepreneurial process. It is concluded that, with effectuation, personal and social identities can guide effectual (intuitive) or causal (planned) behavior, which shapes the entrepreneurial activities.

show abstract

Section: Analysis and Discussion Of Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussion With More Publications In Addition To the Slrmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effectuation and identity in entrepreneurship: A systematic review

Silva

Lima

2023

Contextus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Barraket and Yoesefpour 2013;Ormiston 2019). Important to note is that the values and philosophies of social entrepreneurs may guide them in identifying and selecting appropriate funders (Onishi et al 2018;Pandey et al 2017). Another component that may influence the main motivation for social impact measurement is the stage of the relationship between funder and social entrepreneur (see Nguyen, Szkudlarek, and Seymour 2015;Lall 2019).…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

To Prove and Improve: An Empirical Study on Why Social Entrepreneurs Measure Their Social Impact

Rijn

Raab

Roosma

et al. 2021

Journal of Social Entrepreneurship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This large-scale statistical study tests the validity of two factors that explain why social entrepreneurs measure their social impact as addressed by qualitative case based research. For this purpose, data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2015-survey is used to test the significance of the 'measuring to prove' and 'measuring to improve' dichotomy. Based on the results of a fixed-effects logistic regression analysis, this paper finds validation for both factors. Hence, the empirical setup allows for generalising the findings to a broader scope. Regarding 'measuring to prove', this paper finds that social entrepreneurs who receive funding from the government are more likely to measure their social impact compared to receiving funds from other sources. Regarding 'measuring to improve', this paper finds that social impact measurement is more likely among social entrepreneurs who innovate and prioritise their social mission. In addition, the 'measuring to improve' factor seems to be a stronger predictor for measuring social impact than the 'measuring to prove' factor. This paper may guide the actions of funders , policy makers and scholars who are engaged in the field of social entrepreneurship, generally, and social impact measurement, specifically.

show abstract

“…Instead of planning for the future, the future is imagined by learning from past experiences. The experienced pasts refer to the lived experience and circumstances of entrepreneurs (Harmeling, 2011;Onishi et al, 2018;Watson, 2013) that function as a 'living heritage which opens up more applications or a portfolio of options' (Andersen, 2008, p. 58). Furthermore, the experienced past consists of shared experiences that are embodied in fragments of culture such as images, objects (Valliere & Gegenhuber, 2014) and language (Lieber, 2015).…”

Section: Introducing the Concepts Of The Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Food systems in transition: conceptualizing sustainable food entrepreneurship

Gaast

Leeuwen

Wertheim-Heck

2021

International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents the sustainable food entrepreneurship framework (SFEF). It aims to further the understanding of the role of entrepreneurship in the sustainability transition of the food system, especially in the context of food system relocalization. The framework conceptualizes sustainable food entrepreneurship as a cyclical ongoing process of change. We argue this enables transcending the behaviour of entrepreneurs and their enterprises and map the ongoing development they fit into. The framework is based on literature reviews and expert interviews in the Dutch city-region of Almere-Flevoland. Theoretically, it expands on effectuation and bricolage theory, i.e. the 'resourcefulness perspective', that centres the socio-material context in the entrepreneurial process. The framework assumes the uncertainty of sustainability incites a cyclical process of change and implores entrepreneurs to reflect on the past before imagining the future. These imagined futures must be fitted to the socio-material context before emerging as artefacts (e.g. products, services or firms), which incites new uncertainties and a new cycle of change. Our framework has implications for policy and science. Its temporal dimension, that accentuates the continuous change entrepreneurship spurs, incites a reevaluation of terms such as 'success' and 'failure'. Moreover, it stresses the importance of intermediary actors in facilitating entrepreneurship.

show abstract

An Effectual Perspective On How Social Entrepreneurs Select, Combine, And Orchestrate Resources

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Effectuation and identity in entrepreneurship: A systematic review

Effectuation and identity in entrepreneurship: A systematic review

To Prove and Improve: An Empirical Study on Why Social Entrepreneurs Measure Their Social Impact

Food systems in transition: conceptualizing sustainable food entrepreneurship

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About