2021
DOI: 10.1080/09617353.2021.1921547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective software reliability growth model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean absolute error (MAE) measures the difference between the predicted number of failures and the observed value, considering the number of observations as the sum of absolute values [56]. Predictive ratio risk (PRR) is measured by dividing the distance from the predicted number of failures to the actual number of failures by the predicted value with respect to model estimation [57]. Predictive power (PP) is measured as the distance from the actual number of failures to the predicted number of failures divided by the actual value [58].…”
Section: Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean absolute error (MAE) measures the difference between the predicted number of failures and the observed value, considering the number of observations as the sum of absolute values [56]. Predictive ratio risk (PRR) is measured by dividing the distance from the predicted number of failures to the actual number of failures by the predicted value with respect to model estimation [57]. Predictive power (PP) is measured as the distance from the actual number of failures to the predicted number of failures divided by the actual value [58].…”
Section: Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also crucial to evaluate the software's reliability before its release in order to avoid risk and maintenance costs. A software system's reliability refers to its ability to function for a fixed period of time under certain operational and environmental circumstances (Haque and Ahmad, 2021). As a result, there is a significant need for high-quality software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saxena et al [10] proposed a SRGM that assumes imperfect debugging by a two-step process that considers fault observation and fault removal. Haque [11] presented a new Software Reliability Growth Model (SRGM) with the structure of a Logistic Growth Model in which the fault detection rate increases as the test department's skill improves as the test progresses. Nafreen et al [12] developed a SRGM with a bathtub-shaped fault detection rate function and proposed the conditional maximization algorithms to fit the models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%