1998
DOI: 10.1007/s001530050095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective proof that open sets are Ramsey

Abstract: Solovay has shown that if O is an open subset of P (ω) with code S and no infinite set avoids O, then there is an infinite set hyperarithmetic in S that lands in O. We provide a direct proof of this theorem that is easily formalizable in AT R0.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(b) Unlike GH, the Ellentuck topology is generated by a continuum of analytic (in fact G δ ) sets; a countable effective coarsening of significance has been studied in [7]. 5.…”
Section: Examples A: Submetrizable Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) Unlike GH, the Ellentuck topology is generated by a continuum of analytic (in fact G δ ) sets; a countable effective coarsening of significance has been studied in [7]. 5.…”
Section: Examples A: Submetrizable Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the following uniformly effective version of the clopen Ramsey Theorem (the proof of the clopen Ramsey Theorem in ATR 0 is carried out in [6], with another proof given in [1]; the effective bounds for the complexity are given in [5]). THEOREM 7.9 (ATR 0 ).…”
Section: Thenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that in general, if we can prove a theorem in second order arithmetic plus the existence of an idempotent ultrafilter, we might hope to replace the derivation with the theorem above: if we can arrange all "queries" to the idempotent ultrafilter along a countable well-ordering (where later queries can depend on the results of previous ones), we can then iterate the preceding theorem along the ordering, and the final semigroup will then provide answers to all queries in the proof. (Such methods have been used for proofs using nonprincipal ultrafilters with no additional properties; see, for instance, [1]. )…”
Section: Definition 21mentioning
confidence: 99%