2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective method for comparing the turbulence intensity from LDA measurements and CFD predictions within a ship propeller jet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow simulation of this paper was carried out by using the solution technique implemented in Fluent (v.6.3.26) (Lam, Robinson, Hamill, & Johnston, 2012). The details are as follows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flow simulation of this paper was carried out by using the solution technique implemented in Fluent (v.6.3.26) (Lam, Robinson, Hamill, & Johnston, 2012). The details are as follows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mismatching hub can decrease the propulsive efficiency and cavitation performance significantly. In recent years, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques have been employed more and more extensively for analyzing the performance of hydrodynamic systems (Carlton, Radosavljevic, & Whitworth, 2009;Carrica, Fu, & Stern, 2011;Dubbioso, Muscari, & Mascio, 2014;Lam, Hamill, & Robinson, 2013;Lam, Robinson, Hamill, & Johnston, 2012;Shamsi, Ghassemi, Molyneux, & Liu, 2014), designing propeller ESDs (Çelik, 2007;Lee, Bae, Kim, & Hoshino, 2014;Park, Jung, & Kim, 2005) and simulating the cavitation (Rafael et al, 2015;Singhal, Athavale, Li, & Jiang, 2002;Watanabe, Kawamura, Yoshihisa, Maeda, & Rhee, 2003;Zhu & Fang, 2012). The International Towing Tank Conference (ITTC) discussed applications of the CFD method to calculating the hydrodynamic performance of propellers and believed that it could be used to obtain the open-water performance and pressure distribution of a propeller accurately (Salvatore, Streckwal, & Terwisga, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen from the figure that the speed of the water body due to rotation on the propeller surface is the highest on the outflow plane, and then it begins to decay. In 2012, Lam [9][10] systematically summarized the flow characteristics of the propeller jet without boundary effects by using physical experiments and numerical simulation methods, analyzed the three components of the jet velocity (axial, radial, and tangential) and discussed the attenuation and distribution of turbulence intensity in a propeller jet. Although previous studies have studied the effect of the propeller jet shape and the bottom boundary on the initial flow velocity, the effect of the bottom boundary on the propeller jet shape has not been specifically studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hamill et al (2004) found the core assumptions of this theory inadequately described the process involved. More recently Lam et al (2012a) described semi-empirical methods for predicting the efflux velocity of the main axial component of the flow, based on a range of experiments with one test propeller, while Lam et al (2012b) extended the discussion by including measurements of turbulence intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%