2014
DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2013137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Effective Criterion to Prevent Injection Test Numerical Simulation from Spurious Oscillations

Abstract: Geosciences Numerical Methods Modélisation numérique en géosciencesOil & Gas Science and Technology -Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, Vol. 69 (2014), No. 4, Copyright © 2014, IFP Energies nouvelles > EditorialJ. E. Roberts > Modeling Fractures in a Poro-Elastic MediumUn modèle de fracture dans un milieu poro-élastique > Modeling Fluid Flow in Faulted BasinsModélisation des transferts fluides dans les bassins faillés Re´sume´-Un crite`re efficace pour pre´venir les oscillations parasites dans la simulation nume´ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synthetic data were generated by simulating the dynamic propagation of the temperature front with a single active well numerical simulator for fluid dynamics in porous media accounting for thermal effects (Verga et al, 2008, Verga et al, 2014. The resulting temperature profiles are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Geothermal Doubletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synthetic data were generated by simulating the dynamic propagation of the temperature front with a single active well numerical simulator for fluid dynamics in porous media accounting for thermal effects (Verga et al, 2008, Verga et al, 2014. The resulting temperature profiles are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Geothermal Doubletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has gained attention over the last 20 years in the oil and gas industry (El-Khazindar et al, 2002;Hollaender, Filas et al, 2002;Verga & Rocca, 2010;Rocca & Viberti, 2013;Verga & Rocca, 2010;Verga & Salina Borello 2016;Woie et al, 2000). Some authors have dedicated to the study and development of interpretation methodologies based on analytical models (Banerjee et al, 1998;Barreto et al, 2011;Boughrara et al, 2007;Habte & Onur, 2014;Levitan, 2003), numerical models (Verga et al, 2008(Verga et al, , 2014, or hybrid interpretation approaches that adopt numerical simulation along with standard monophasic models (Verga et al, 2011(Verga et al, , 2012. Successful real cases have also been documented (Azzarone et al, 2011;Beretta et al, 2007;Tripaldi et al, 2009).…”
Section: Injection Test: Principles and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%