2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2013.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An effective construction method for multi-level uniform designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further distinguish geometrically nonisomorphic designs, uniformity is one of the mostly used criteria to compare the performance of geometrically nonisomorphic designs. More recently, Tang and Xu (2013), Tang, Xu, and Lin (2012) and Xu, Zhang, and Tang (2014) also used uniformity to compare fractional factorial designs via level permutations.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To further distinguish geometrically nonisomorphic designs, uniformity is one of the mostly used criteria to compare the performance of geometrically nonisomorphic designs. More recently, Tang and Xu (2013), Tang, Xu, and Lin (2012) and Xu, Zhang, and Tang (2014) also used uniformity to compare fractional factorial designs via level permutations.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So we use the average discrepancy value (Tang & Xu, 2013;Tang et al, 2012;Xu et al, 2014) of all designs in P (D) to describe the performance of the result of the searching method. Recently, Tang and Xu (2013) derived the relation between average CD 2 values and generalized word length pattern.…”
Section: Average CD 2 Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Uniform Design can be the solution of the problem. Its aim to scatter design points uniformly on an experimental region [3]. UD can obtain the most information by the smallest number of tests, and greatly reduce direct influence of the initial population and the initial value of algorithm parameters on the results of parameter identification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%