2018
DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.7634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AN EFFECT OF GRINDING ON MICROHARDNESS AND RESIDUAL STRESS IN 20MnCr5 FOLLOWING SINGLE-PIECE FLOW LOW-PRESSURE CARBURIZING

Abstract: The aim of the experiment described in the paper was to determine the effect of selected conditions of abrasive machining on the size and distribution of microhardness and residual stresses developed in the technological surface layer of flat specimens made of 20MnCr5 steel. The specimens were subjected to single-piece flow low-pressure carburizing (LPC) and high-pressure gas quenching (HPGQ) in a 4D Quenching chamber, in order to achieve the effective case depth of ECD=0.4 mm. This was followed by grinding t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This makes abrasive machining of this steel difficult and requires appropriate conditions for the machining process. The works to date in this area [28,29] were devoted to the determination of the effect of the type of abrasive grain used on the microhardness and residual stress when applying GF by the flooding method and the MQL method. The conclusions presented in these papers show that the MQL method may, under certain processing conditions, be an alternative to the flood method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes abrasive machining of this steel difficult and requires appropriate conditions for the machining process. The works to date in this area [28,29] were devoted to the determination of the effect of the type of abrasive grain used on the microhardness and residual stress when applying GF by the flooding method and the MQL method. The conclusions presented in these papers show that the MQL method may, under certain processing conditions, be an alternative to the flood method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LPC and HPGQ, when compared with traditional methods, have shown better results [8][9][10][11]. Moreover, the single-piece flow model takes every single element through the exact same position and process conditions as the others, avoiding variations in the physical and metallurgical characteristics over the placement that the element occupies [2,3,12,13]. Additionally, in a 4D quenching chamber, the inflow of cooling gas from all sides and the rotation of parts are performed to support a uniform cooling effect [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%