2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-022-01762-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An EEG-based subject-independent emotion recognition model using a differential-evolution-based feature selection algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lokesh, S. et al [ 33 ]proposed Fractional Chimpanzee Optimization Algorithm (FrChOA) which combined the Chimpanzee Optimization Algorithm (COA) with fractional order calculus, and its classification accuracy was 88.48 % with 20 channels selected. Kannadasan K et al [ 34 ] proposed a differential-evolution-based feature selection algorithm (DEFS) to obtain an optimal feature set for effective subject-independent for emotion recognition with SVM (DEFS-SVM). It got the classification accuracies of 73.60 % and 74.23 % to detect valence arousal and valence on the DEAP dataset, and they were higher than the Particle Swarm Optimization(PSO) feature selection algorithm by 9.55 % and 9.3 %, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lokesh, S. et al [ 33 ]proposed Fractional Chimpanzee Optimization Algorithm (FrChOA) which combined the Chimpanzee Optimization Algorithm (COA) with fractional order calculus, and its classification accuracy was 88.48 % with 20 channels selected. Kannadasan K et al [ 34 ] proposed a differential-evolution-based feature selection algorithm (DEFS) to obtain an optimal feature set for effective subject-independent for emotion recognition with SVM (DEFS-SVM). It got the classification accuracies of 73.60 % and 74.23 % to detect valence arousal and valence on the DEAP dataset, and they were higher than the Particle Swarm Optimization(PSO) feature selection algorithm by 9.55 % and 9.3 %, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, the capability of ML to find out patterns in data makes this approach suitable for the study of the brain's activity, both in terms of emotions and affective indicators. Support Vector Machines (SVM) [23][24][25][26][27], K-Nearest Neighbor [28], Naïve Bayes [29], Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) [30], Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) [28], and Decision Tree (DT) [31] have been commonly used. Moreover, solutions based on ensemble learning such as Random Forest (RF) [31], Bagged Tree (BT) [32], AdaBoost [33] and Extreme Gradient Boosting [34] have been proposed in the same context for the classification of EEG processed data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%