An Educational Intervention to Change Planned Behavior Concerning Midwife‐Assisted Out‐of‐Hospital Childbirth

Hans, Jason D.; Kimberly, Claire

doi:10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00036.x

Cited by 9 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Participants in these studies did not yet have children but reported future childbirth intentions, underscoring opportunities for people to become more informed about birth settings. Participants in one study reported a significant increase in interest for home and birth center settings after exposure to The Business of Being Born , either for themselves or recommending such an option to their family and friends 54 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors influencing birth setting decision making in the United States: An integrative review

George

Shorten

Lyons

et al. 2022

Birth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The United States has the highest perinatal morbidity and mortality (M&M) rates among all high‐resource countries in the world. Birth settings (birth center, home, or hospital) influence clinical outcomes, experience of care, and health care costs. Increasing use of low‐intervention birth settings can reduce perinatal M&M. This integrative review evaluated factors influencing birth setting decision making among women and birthing people in the United States. Methods A search strategy was implemented within the CINAHL, PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guided the review, and the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence‐Based Practice model was used to evaluate methodological quality and appraisal of the evidence. The Whittemore and Knafl integrative review framework informed the extraction and analysis of the data and generation of findings. Results We identified 23 articles that met inclusion criteria. Four analytical themes were generated that described factors that influence birth setting decision making in the United States: “Birth Setting Safety vs. Risk,” “Influence of Media, Family, and Friends on Birth Setting Awareness,” “Presence or Absence of Choice and Control,” and “Access to Options.” Discussion Supporting women and birthing people to make informed decisions by providing information about birth setting options and variations in models of care by birth setting is a critical patient‐centered strategy to ensure equitable access to low‐intervention birth settings. Policies that expand affordable health insurance to cover midwifery care in all birth settings are needed to enable people to make informed choices about birth location that align with their values, individual pregnancy characteristics, and preferences.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors influencing birth setting decision making in the United States: An integrative review

George

Shorten

Lyons

et al. 2022

Birth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For some researchers, the ways in which television reflects or reinforces social norms around birth and motherhood is at issue (O'Brien Hill 2014;Sears et al 2011;Morris et al 2010;Verena Siebert 2012;Feasey 2012), still others focus on how women make sense of televised birth (De Benedictis 2016;Bessett et al 2018;Hall 2013). In a minority are those who research the role of television in health education and its potential for public health interventions (Kavanagh et al 2012;Hans et al 2011). These findings are summarised in Table 1.…”

Section: Results: a Map Of The Fieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is partly because of the nature of the "audiences" that have been researched. Experimental psychology studies have relied on student populations, sometimes all female (Vitek et al 2018), sometimes mixed sex (Hans et al 2011;Kavanagh et al 2012). While this practice is not uncommon, questions remain about the representativeness of student samples and the transferability of findings to the general population (Paul H.P.…”

Section: Production Representation or Receptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However also in the literature are suggestions that television might prepare women for birth (Feasey 2012), "provide other ways of knowing" about birth (Horeck 2016, 174) or "democratise' information about birth." (Tyler et al 2013) Alternative productions are more often linked to the potential to increase demand for midwifery-led care (Hans et al 2011) or their production is advocated, recognising the power of the media but the inadequacy of mainstream broadcasting. Hall (2013) calls for more variety in depictions of birth, including depictions of postnatal depression, poor maternal or infant health, with the implication that access to representations that reflect one's own experiences would be beneficial to women.…”

Section: Televised Birth Is a Feminist Issuementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Quantitative approaches are employed in public health research, examining the role of television in influencing intended place of birth (Hans et al 2011), in knowledge of birthing practices (Kavanagh et al 2012a) and fear of childbirth (Vitek et al 2018). Two of these studies (Hans et al 2011;Vitek et al 2018) found short-term effects on knowledge and attitudes among their participants. Longer term effects were not investigated, and as noted above, participants were convenience samples of students rather than people for whom birth television had specific saliency.…”

Section: Televised Birth Is a Feminist Issuementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Childbirth on television: a scoping review and recommendations for further research

Roberts

Benedictis

2019

Feminist Media Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Factual and reality television shows that depict childbirth are both commercially successful and controversial. Social debate focuses on the potential implications for women's experiences of birth and their health. This scoping review critically analyses published literature to assess the state of knowledge about the influence of factual and reality television on the expectations and experiences of childbearing women, and to make recommendations for future research. Recognising the complexity of researching the relationship between the media and lived health experiences, we critically engage with the theoretical and methodological underpinnings of the published literature and its substantive findings. We argue that the field is limited by a disconnect between media studies and health studies. Feminist approaches have both criticised the medicalised view of childbirth seen to dominate mainstream media, and the valorisation of "natural childbirth" as a standard which also disciplines women. Very little research has engaged with pregnant women's views and experiences. Future research should engage more rigorously with diverse women who are pregnant or have recently become mothers. Recommendations for future research also include transdisciplinary collaboration for methodological innovation, research about television production processes and research that takes social media and the changing nature of television into account.

show abstract

Midwifery students’ views and experiences of birth on mainstream factual television

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An Educational Intervention to Change Planned Behavior Concerning Midwife‐Assisted Out‐of‐Hospital Childbirth

Cited by 9 publications

References 26 publications

Factors influencing birth setting decision making in the United States: An integrative review

Factors influencing birth setting decision making in the United States: An integrative review

Childbirth on television: a scoping review and recommendations for further research

Midwifery students’ views and experiences of birth on mainstream factual television

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About