2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/abe0d9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An edge-labeling graph neural network method for tool wear condition monitoring using wear image with small samples

Abstract: Tool wear condition monitoring (TCM) is of great significance to ensure manufacturing quality in milling processes, and the development of deep learning (DL) in recent years has led to increasing interest in DL-based TCM methods. However, most of these DL-based methods rely on large training samples to achieve good performances, which is expensive. In this paper, a new TCM method based on an edge-labeling graph neural network (EGNN) is proposed for small training datasets. First, the tool wear image is input i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The network allows for the autonomous and effective extraction of tool degradation features and RUL prediction.In online tool RUL prediction, for a new tool to be tested in cutting conditions, the same multidimensional signals are collected by multiple sensors as in offline training, pre-processed with the same data, and input into the trained model to predict the tool RUL online in real time. According to the ISO3685-1977 standard, the tool wear was defined as the flank wear width VB [40]. Additionally, according to the relevant literature, the tool RUL was considered terminated when the rear face wear value, VB, of the toolexceeds VB max = 0.45 mm.…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network allows for the autonomous and effective extraction of tool degradation features and RUL prediction.In online tool RUL prediction, for a new tool to be tested in cutting conditions, the same multidimensional signals are collected by multiple sensors as in offline training, pre-processed with the same data, and input into the trained model to predict the tool RUL online in real time. According to the ISO3685-1977 standard, the tool wear was defined as the flank wear width VB [40]. Additionally, according to the relevant literature, the tool RUL was considered terminated when the rear face wear value, VB, of the toolexceeds VB max = 0.45 mm.…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Via related intelligent algorithms, the data-driven diagnostic method can adaptively identify equipment operation status information from existing data without the need of prior knowledge for professional technicians 13 . With an edge-labeling graph neural network method, Zhi et al 14 propose a tool for wear condition monitoring using wear images which suitable for small sample conditions. Mishra et al 15 developed a tool condition estimation method during the precision machining process with the unsupervised approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the late 1980s, TCM has been widely studied [12,13]. Since the mechanical equipment is becoming increasingly complicated, the traditional condition monitoring methods based on physical models and signal processing techniques have been less effective in TCM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%