2016
DOI: 10.1111/gfs.12213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An economically based evaluation index for perennial and short‐term ryegrasses in New Zealand dairy farm systems

Abstract: Grazed pastures based on ryegrass species provide most of the feed for dairy cattle in New Zealand. There are many cultivars of perennial (Lolium perenne), annual and Italian (L. multiflorum), and hybrid (L. boucheanum) ryegrasses available for dairy farmers to use in pasture renewal. This study describes an index which ranks ryegrass cultivars relative to a genetic base according to the estimated economic value (EV) of seasonal dry matter (DM) traits. A farm system model was used to derive EVs ($ ha−1 calcula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In New Zealand, the difference between the highest-ranked and the lowest-ranked perennial ryegrass cultivar ranges from $556 profit/ha to $863/ha, depending on the region. Since the 1960s, pasture selection has delivered $12-$18/ha.year in extra farm profits (Chapman et al 2017). The immediate research challenge is to evaluate the FVI in a farm-system context with support from modelling, and to extend the FVI beyond yield evaluation to nutritive and persistence traits of the cultivars.…”
Section: Capturing Forage-yield Benefits From Genetic Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In New Zealand, the difference between the highest-ranked and the lowest-ranked perennial ryegrass cultivar ranges from $556 profit/ha to $863/ha, depending on the region. Since the 1960s, pasture selection has delivered $12-$18/ha.year in extra farm profits (Chapman et al 2017). The immediate research challenge is to evaluate the FVI in a farm-system context with support from modelling, and to extend the FVI beyond yield evaluation to nutritive and persistence traits of the cultivars.…”
Section: Capturing Forage-yield Benefits From Genetic Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When averaged across the three scenarios shown in Table 1, the "under" and "over" treatments resulted in 240-465 kg¨DM/ha lower herbage accumulation compared with the "target" treatment. Using the Dairy NZ Forage Value Index figure for the economic value (EV) of additional pasture grown in autumn in Canterbury ($0.30 per kg¨DM, [38]), this equates to between $70 and $140/ha potential profit foregone. This is the potential economic cost of missing the target range for the optimum residual state of the pasture.…”
Section: Targets For Residual Pasture Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 there is existing information that demonstrates the importance of nutritive value traits and the potential 50 economic returns from trait improvement, the overall breeding effort for nutritive traits in ryegrass has 51 received considerably less attention than for DMY (SMITH et al 1997). Increased breeding effort for 52 nutritive traits, with validated outcomes for animal productivity, would provide enhanced on-farm 53 value to farmers (JAFARI et al 2003a;CHAPMAN et al 2017). 54…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%