2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2020.101129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An economic valuation model for alternative pressure management schemes in water distribution networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The installation of pressure-reducing valves (PRVs) in over-pressured networks has proven to be an effective way of controlling leakage, and the application of pressure management techniques has reduced water supply costs by 20-55% [31]. There are four recognized PM methods for PRVs, which are based on the critical point states [32], namely fixed-outlet (FO), pressure-modulated, time-modulated (TM) and flow-modulated (FM) methods [24,[33][34][35][36]. These techniques have been extensively studied by academics, and there are several case studies of their practical implementation, making them effective means of reducing pressure and leakage [37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The installation of pressure-reducing valves (PRVs) in over-pressured networks has proven to be an effective way of controlling leakage, and the application of pressure management techniques has reduced water supply costs by 20-55% [31]. There are four recognized PM methods for PRVs, which are based on the critical point states [32], namely fixed-outlet (FO), pressure-modulated, time-modulated (TM) and flow-modulated (FM) methods [24,[33][34][35][36]. These techniques have been extensively studied by academics, and there are several case studies of their practical implementation, making them effective means of reducing pressure and leakage [37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at the different end uses of residential water, showering or bathing often represents the highest indoor demand, accounting for 30% to 45% of total residential use (Energy Saving Trust, 2015;Water Research Foundation, 2016;Moslehi et al, 2020). There is also evidence that, among personal hygiene options, showering is preferred over bathing in developed countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moslehi vd. [19], yaptıkları çalışmada su kayıp azaltma çalışmalarının ciddi maliyetler oluşturması nedeniyle yapılacak çalışmalarda ekonomik analiz yapılması gerekliliğini savunmuşlardır. Aktif kaçak kontrolünü referans alarak yaptıkları çalışma ile İran'ın Mashhad şehrinde kısa dönemli ekonomik kaçak seviyesini 27 m³/bağlantı sayısı/yıl olarak tanımlamışlardır.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified